Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Articles tagged 'splits'

Fees, Jeff's On Call!

Jeff’s On Call!: Split Fee Owed?



law_gavel

This week’s inquiry comes from Sue Yager:

Jeff, I really need your help. As an avid reader of The Fordyce Letter for 10 years now, I have always appreciated your insight and knowledge of the recruiting industry, and find myself needing your help for the first time.

I believe I have more of a moral dilemma than a legal dilemma. Here’s the story: 4 years ago I worked with another recruiter, who was with another agency, and we sometimes did splits. This other recruiter emailed a resume to me and told me this candidate was fantastic, and asked whether she would be a good fit with any of my clients. I called the candidate and did a full interview with her even though I didn’t have any job opportunities for her at the time. I kept in touch with this candidate over the past 4 years, and she is now actively interviewing with one of my clients. I have not spoken to the recruiter who sent me her resume for about 2 years, and the candidate hasn’t spoken to her for several years.

Here’s my dilemma: Do I still owe that recruiter part of the fee? I want to do the right thing, but I don’t want to give away money unnecessarily either. (P.S., there was never a formal split fee agreement in place between us.)

Thank you for all of your help.

Respectfully,

Sue

Interviews, The Business of Recruiting

Lessons From a First Placement



Nate Elgert

Like just about every other recruiter, current or former, my first couple of months in this business was a struggle. Everyday I was making 70-80 dials that equaled 25-30 non-sensical ramblings that usually ended in a “not-interested” or a merciful hang up from my target. I was a brand new accounting and finance recruiter who knew nothing at all about accounting, and very little about business in general. The juxtaposition was that I was a hard-headed, sometimes cocky, 30 year-old who thought he knew pretty much everything. As time went on in my first couple of months as a recruiter, that attitude was replaced by a resigned feeling that I was not going to make it out of this alive (figuratively speaking of course). After about 6-8 weeks of this battle, I was ready to throw in the towel and move on. Moving on is what I had done best in my career up to that point. This was my fifth job in seven years, and going in, I was convinced that this must work out or I would be stuck in that revolving door of sales re-treads. It was this feeling, and a fiancé who was not likely to marry an unemployed former golf pro, that kept me coming back every day. Yep, you could say my first couple months as a recruiter was indeed a struggle. Then, one day, I caught a break.

Jeff's On Call!

Jeff’s On Call!: MIA Sourcing Partner



fordyce-default

This post’s inquiry comes from Michael Sayles:

“Dear Jeff,

As a longtime subscriber of The Fordyce Letter and great fan of your Placements and The Law column, I thought I would ask for your opinion on an issue that I am experiencing. As other search firms may have had this same problem, I was hoping you might provide your thoughts on “Jeff On Call!” Here’s the issue:

I was referred to a sourcing organization through a friend whose opinion I value. The contract was signed, the fee paid and two resumes (off target) were received. That was the extent of my contact with this firm. Many unanswered e-mails and calls later I am beginning to think that I need a new approach. Your thoughts would be appreciated.

Again, thank you for your trusted and valued writing.

Mike”

Hi Mike,

Thanks for writing and your most gracious comments about TFL and the PTL column!  It’s so gratifying to hear that we’ve been helping to keep you ahead of the curve.  That’s our job.

The problem with the sourcing arrangement you mentioned is the same problem that exists anywhere in the placement process where compensation is tied to effort rather than results.  Successful deals vary from split fees (usually 50-50 between a candidate recruiter and a client recruiter anywhere in cyberspace) to a small incentive for lead generation by a part-time researcher.  But the common denominator is money in exchange for production.

Uncategorized

Rec Radar Splits Network Q&A



logo

logoFor those who aren’t aware of the Rec Radar, it’s a splits network that launched in March 2008. Currently, recruitment agencies and individual recruiters join the network for free and can list unlimited positions or candidates available to split or for direct hire placement. These job listings appear on recruiters’ “radar” for two months, and after two months, the job listings either fall off “radar” or can be renewed.

The company has now extended its service to employers and candidates, essentially allowing HR departments and employers to load their positions onto the RecRadar.com network.

We recently chatted with Managing Director Peter Fowler to learn more:

Q: What is the fee to recruiters or candidates?

A: There isn’t any charges for candidates. Recruiters can join for free and post positions and candidates for free. For a recruiter-to-recruiter split we charge 5% commission of the placement fee, so for a guaranteed placement, both recruiters receive 47.5% of the placement fee. For a position posted by an employer we charge 15%, and the successful recruiter receives 85% of the placement fee.

Q: What is the typical percentage for these split placements overall?

A: The percentages for a majority of the positions range from 15%-20% of the salary.

Q: Why did you decide to offer this to employers and companies now?

A: We opened this area up because of requests from member agencies to allow employers to post positions directly for them to fill so we analyzed this and conducted market research and found a number of companies had interest in this service to facilitate their PSA requirements. A lot of them have issues when they have multiple suppliers presenting the same candidates. With Rec Radar, a candidate can only have one agent, so this alleviates this issue for them.

Uncategorized

RecruitHire Acquires Dayak



fordyce-default

RecruitHire, a company that helps employers connect with recruiters to fill job openings, has picked up Dayak’s online network of more than 6,000 recruiters and 1,500 employers.

Dayak says its current users can use their existing accounts to log in to RecruitHire.com and begin using the new features immediately. They can also continue to access the Dayak.com website through October 15, 2009, to extract data related to previous submissions.

Dayak has not been without controversy in our industry. As a service that prompts employers to choose the fee they’re willing to pay recruiters for a successful hire, the company offered a clear shift away from percentage-based fees.

Dayak and competitor BountyJobs were both nominated for OnRec’s “2008 Game Changing Recruiting Technology” (the award ultimately went to JobStick). Another firm that is still around is the U.K.-based www.agreeyourfee.com, which offers a similar business platform in that employers post jobs and how much they want to pay a recruiter to fill the vacancy. The company deducts a 15% flat rate from the total fee that the employer sets; in essence, the company charges the recruiter 7.5% and the employer 7.5%.

Although changing recruitment technologies will always seem like a revolving door to an extent, some in the industry wonder whether this specific model can even succeed.

Industry blogger Sarah White notes that “in order to truly be successful, it would take a partnership with (or acquisition by) a major job board that wanted to expand their current services to create a network for higher level positions that aren’t traditionally advertised on their site and attract the 3rd party recruiter that wouldn’t think of using their sites now.”

Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

Split over Splits



fordyce-default

With what feels like a sudden crop of tadpole recruiting boards added to the long-established split networks it seemed like a good time to mention something prompted by a discussion in the Pinnacle Society forum. One end of the ‘split stick’ has people who do nothing but splits and the other has the people who say ‘Why would I ever split a fee when I can do it myself?’