Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Articles tagged 'managing'

Entrepreneurship, For Managers

Anatomy of a Failed Recruiter



failstamp

Other than writing pithy blog posts and tweeting, a big part of what I do to pay the rent is consult. Over the years I’ve become a lot better at it and have, through trial an error, gathered a few nuggets of wisdom that have helped me become not quite as awful at my job. The following is part of my Living in the 21st Century series, this time dedicated to shedding a little light on how consultants can fail. At one time or another I’ve done (or seen) most of these things, which is why it gives me such great joy to shine a spotlight on them.

A recruiting colleague recently suggested that many of the following items apply directly to recruiters as well as consultants, specifically in the area of business development, and that I should adapt this list as a cautionary note for recruiters, and particularly for the business owners who manage them.

Entrepreneurship, For Managers

Do You Really Want Entrepreneurial Employees?



ArmyOfEntrepreneurs-200x303

I’ll admit it: I’m biased.

You see, all of the entrepreneurs I grew up with were much better entrepreneurs than employees. My father is an entrepreneur and both of my grandfathers were entrepreneurs, too. I’ve also heard stories from their time working as an employee and not only were they not as productive as they could have been, they were less than happy being an employee. Being their own boss was a better fit for multiple reasons.

So when I was sent Army of Entrepreneurs by Jennifer Prosek, I was admittedly skeptical. In some ways, I still am but there seems to be a better argument out there for incorporating principles of entrepreneurship into a company. 

For Managers, TFL archives

Effective Leadership and Performance Optimization, Part 2: Developing a Culture of Performance



Henry Ford

Recruiting is a tough business; an activity oriented phone- and Internet-based business where statistics indicate that nine out of ten new recruits don’t survive their first calendar year. It’s also one of the only businesses where the product can tell you “no.” Add to these inherent challenges the fact that research shows the average US worker wastes 26% of their day on socializing and personal Internet use (Malachowski, 2005), which is probably closer to 40% now that social media has taken over with Facebook and Twitter. The ability for a manager to develop a strong culture of performance is extremely difficult, if not outright impossible.

Some organizations manage to do this despite the challenges. How do they do it? How do they grow aggressively and reach 50-100 employees while others struggle to hire and keep a few productive ones? The answer: successful owners and managers develop a strong culture of performance.

For Managers, TFL archives

Double Play – Effective Leadership and Performance Optimization, Part 1: Getting Your Team to Own Their Performance



world-series-trophy

When things wind down past mid-season in baseball, separating the teams in the pennant race from other teams is not a difficult task. It seems year after year the same teams are vying for the top and showing strong performances, as many others are struggling to remain competitive.

With hopes long gone of any chance of a winning season, what happens to the team’s morale? How frustrating for the owners who spend millions on key talent, for team managers who spend countless hours coaching, and for players who have given the game their heart and soul. Do they continue with a great attitude, knowing their ultimate goal will not be achieved, or do they accept the situation and go through the motions of playing out another average season of effort and performance?

The real question is what do the successful team managers do that give them more wins consistently while many managers struggle to keep their teams alive with mediocre results year after year? Can’t we ask the same of our industry? Why do some offices see recruiting performance success and enjoy strong growth and profitability on a consistent basis year after year while others just struggle to survive in any economy? Like a professional baseball team that can never get the right formula to consistently be in the pennant race in the middle of the season let alone the end of the season — the problem ultimately lies in ownership and accountability.

Editor's Corner, The Business of Recruiting, Weigh In!

Falling Out Of Love With Your Work



screw-you-guys-Im-going-home

William Tincup was featured recently in John Sumser‘s Top 100 Influencers, which is a running series that Sumser is doing on recruiting and HR professionals who have made an impact in our industry. While Tincup isn’t a recruiting agency guy, he is a self-employed professional services guy, just like many of you. Tincup, along with Bret Starr, co-founded their company Starr Tincup in November of 2000. Starr Tincup is a marketing consultancy that serves the recruiting and HR community. He has been responsible for building the company brand, including the website, book (Try Not To F&ck This Up), direct marketing, email marketing, event strategy, social media strategy, and so forth. Tincup has been known (affectionately? notoriously?) throughout the recruiting and HR community for his low-brow sense of humor, colorful language, and yet his approachability and willingness to have conversations about his work and his thoughts on business and marketing strategy.

Recently, he fell out of love with his work and decided to move on.

At this point, you may be wondering “What does this have to do with me? This guy’s a marketer; I’m a recruiting professional!” I promise – there is a good point to all of this.

Falling out of love with one’s work is common. We’ve all had days where we’ve sworn that if we get on the phone with one more rude person or if one more client tries to cheap out on paying a fee, we’re through. Of course, few are the time when we actually follow through on those threats. But that thought is still lingering in the back of our minds – “Is this all really worth it?”

William Tincup’s story struck me because he detailed the reasons he decided to throw in the towel. He stopped believing in the outsourced marketing services business model. He was frustrated with the double standards applied to his efforts vs. in-house marketers’ efforts. He became annoyed that, as an external service provider, his status was constantly being threatened by these ridiculous standards. And the final straw for him, as he states:

“…the realization that over the course of 10 years in the game I might of [sic] been told “thank you” seven or eight times.  I (read: my firm) changed lives, changed destinies, built lasting brands, created market share, created real value, got people promoted, etc, etc. Yeah, I know – payment for services rendered was my thanks.  Yeah, well, that wasn’t enough.”

I would be very surprised if just about every person reading this article hasn’t struggled with at least one of these issues at some point during your professional recruiting career. Who hasn’t felt like the red-headed stepchild at least once when working with a difficult client? Who hasn’t been held to some crazy standards as an external recruiter that an internal employee would never be held to? And who hasn’t wished that once, just once, someone would thank them for all of the amazing talent they’ve helped shepherd in to an organization?

When you really fall out of love with your work, how do you know when it’s time to say “Enough!” and leave before you become bitter? Is it just a bad case of the Mondays, or is this a recurring gut feeling that just will not go away? How do you get past the rut and fall back in love with what you do? Weigh in with your thoughts in the comments below. Sharing your experience might just save someone from calling it quits!

Uncategorized

Manager’s Corner: An Alternative to Constructive Criticism



fordyce-default

Constructive criticism is a myth. If it really worked, we would all be perfect by now.

Remember the last time someone gave you constructive criticism?

Were you motivated to improve and take their advice or was it just plain awful and you couldn’t wait for that moment to end? The motive to point out your “deficit” was probably well-intentioned, but the method of delivery usually ends up developing into a deficit itself.

Consider how you give constructive criticism to your employees when you see an area in them that needs to be improved.

“Why can’t they just take my advice?” you ask yourself when you give feedback. You might not visibly see the harm in how you do it, but the veiled and valid emotions that swell up in your subordinates clouds their perspective. The feelings of anger, self-doubt, and insecurity overpower and overshadow any logical desire to improve. The result is a frustrated employee, a frustrated manager, and a deficit that needs improvement.

So how can we as managers communicate with our employees in a way that gets the point across without getting them angry?

TFL archives

What Do You Owe A Departing Consultant



fordyce-default

We are constantly asked about the “law” that covers compensation to a consultant when he or she leaves with placements still outstanding. Determining when a “placement” has occurred under these circumstances is a little like trying to figure out when a fetus becomes a human being. Owners tend to sound like abortionists, ex-employees like right-to-lifers. For once and for all, let’s develop an objective standard. You may wish to rank activities with different weighting, but here’s a guide to follow:

1. HOW MUCH DID THE CONSULTANT DO?

At the beginning of a placement is the writing of a job order. At the end, is the expiration of the guarantee period. Even if there is no solicitation of the job order or no guarantee, the equivalent occurs, so let’s look at the 10 key items, and assign 10% each.

ITEM PERCENT

Writing Job Order………………………. 10

Identifying Candidate………………… 20

Recruiting Candidate………………….. 30

Presenting Candidate………………….. 40

Interview (Send-out)………………….. 50

Offer………………………………………… 60

Acceptance (Hire)………………………. 70

Sending Invoice…………………………. 80

Start Date………………………………….. 90

Expiration of Guarantee Period….. 100

Let’s assume your consultant leaves after the first interview (send-out). That gives them a 50% score. Of course, the consultant will argue that the five remaining items required no time or expertise at all. And in isolated cases, this may be true. It may also be true that the candidate was already in your files, and you told the consultant to present him. If you get hung up in these variances, you’ll be right back where you started from, so let’s give all of the ones that look like this 50%. That’s the basic score. Without any other factors, the consultant would be entitled to 50% of the commission when the fee is received and the guarantee period expires.

Now let’s look at the other split factors.

2. IS A COMMISSION SPLIT INVOLVED?

If a commission split applies, we suggest you use your existing procedure. This means that if the consultant who writes the JO gets 50% and the one who provides the candidate gets 50%, that’s the maximum either can obtain when they terminate. In our example, the consultant who leaves would receive 50% of 50%, or 25% of the total commission. The one who remains would receive the regular 50%.

3. WHAT IS THE REASON FOR THE TERMINATION?

While the reason for termination should make no difference, the courts have considered it. You’ll consider it too … particularly if you’re angry or just don’t want to capitalize a new competitor.

The reason for termination can be factored into the basic score as follows:

REASON PERCENT

Voluntary termination to

leave recruiting field……………………. 0

Involuntary termination for

poor performance………………………… 0

Voluntary termination to

continue in recruiting field……….. - 10

Involuntary termination for

violation of Employment

Agreement or Company Policy…. - 20

4. DID THE EX-CONSULTANT ASSIST IN CLOSING?

Although there ought to be a law against a consultant loitering by rapping with the client or candidate, there isn’t. In fact, some wedge themselves right in between you and that fee beautifully. If you let them, we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt. If you don’t, we’ll penalize them. Loitering is bad for your business.

CONDUCT PERCENT

Authorized communication with

client or candidate………………….. + 20

Unauthorized communication with

client or candidate…………………… - 10

Interference with placement………. - 20

5. WAS ADDITIONAL TIME AND EFFORT REQUIRED?

The consultant says they did everything to make the placement. Then you say you (or another consultant) did everything. The problem is that the commission is only part of the fee, so the court can decide you were just earning the “house” amount. If you accurately document the time and effort expended, and it appears to be extraordinary though, you’d be well on your way to offsetting the commission.

We can’t give you any guidelines here, because each situation is different. You’ve probably thought of additional variables, but this isn’t a formula to split atoms, only placement fees. The world won’t wobble on its axis if you change it, as long as you’re consistent in its application.

It’s like the law – arbitrary, but everyone knows where they stand, and a court can apply it. You may want to incorporate it into your policy manual or employment agreements. To make sure your consultants understand the formula, have them sign something as follows:

__________________and CONSULTANT agree to apply the attached formula in determining the amount of commission due to CONSULTANT upon termination of employment.

TFL archives

Brave New World: Making Placements – Past, Present, Future



fordyce-default

Our industry’s top consultants, managers, and trainers are great leaders. They are passionate about the business. They are innovators and risk-takers. They are skilled communicators who inspire others to greater heights.

Great leaders are optimistic visionaries. They have the capacity to interpret trends and foresee the future. This “first mover advantage” creates wealth.

Great leaders convey universal messages which appeal to the hearts and minds of many.

Thomas Jefferson inscribed “Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”

John F. Kennedy evoked “We shall go to the moon and return a man safely to the Earth.”

In the same way:

  • Master artists create timeless works with their vision.
  • Legendary sports coaches use visualization techniques to win championships.
  • CEOs of high-performing firms craft mission statements from their vision.

Leadership in Search

Search consultants are leaders of the placement process. We lead clients. We lead candidates. We lead candidates to accept offers with clients. The most successful can vision a placement from the start of the process. They can predict the probability of a placement after initial conversations with clients and candidates.

Top consultants start with the end in mind. They have a plan.

An exercise many know well in achieving a larger vision is to write down goals (both business and personal) and a timeline to achieve them. Another is to visualize goals by drawing a picture of where you will be and what you will have at future dates (e.g., a specific car, house, travel destination, community position.) The key here is to be as specific as possible with imaging your goals (e.g., what model and color car or what you’ll be wearing at a future business event). The hard part for many is knowing what you want.

Testing Your Vision

Ask yourself these two questions:

1) Do you know what you want?

2) Do you know how to get what you want?

The answer to the first question is about vision. It’s about being passionate about something that truly interests you. The second, how to get what you want, is about goals. This involves creating an action plan, working the plan and committing yourself to realizing your goals.

Achievement of goals begins with a personal vision.

In my training I use a fun exercise that gets to the heart of what people truly want. I pass around a rectangular 3″ x 10″ green piece of paper to each attendee blank side up. When everyone has one, they flip it. On the reverse side is a mock $10 million check made out to cash. (“Don’t try to deposit it,” I say, “The money is in another account!”) I ask the group, “What’s the first thing that comes to mind?” To the readers of this article I ask the same, “What would you do with $10 million bucks?” In other words, if money were no object, what would you do? Your answer should help you discover your personal vision.

The New World of Search

My vision for this article came from today’s converging trends, including:

The Internet’s impact on the search business.
The recent grueling job market.
Economic and demographic trends.
Articles and books on leadership.
New Media + Reality TV.
The books Brave New World and 1984.

Have you ever read George Orwell’s 1984 or Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World? Influenced by World Wars, both depict anti-utopian worlds which limit human individuality and freedoms. The stories’ negative messages are so disturbingly powerful that their effect is to shock readers into preventing the possibility of these worlds from materializing. In 1984, Big Brother is always watching. Technology is ever-present and human relationships are destroyed by the state. Likewise in Brave New World, human life has been industrialized by technological “advances.”

We in search have entered a new world with new technologies and new rules.

It is for us to decide whether the outcome will be positive or negative.

New technologies will continuously change the way we do business. If we harness them to our advantage, they can assist us. If we don’t, they have the potential to erode the foundation of our business by diminishing our relationships with clients and candidates.

Let’s take a look at making placements in ten year intervals: In 1984 (pre-PC), 1994 (pre-Internet), 2004 (today) and 2014 (the fun part). To compare decades in time and predict how future placements will be made, we need a central theme. We’ll focus on what I see is at the core of the search business information:

How we learn, store and retrieve it;
How we use it and convey it;
How we manage it and make money from it.

Two caveats before proceeding:

Caveat 1: Since I wasn’t in the business in the mid 80′s, many who were have shared with me details of those times. Thank you.

Caveat 2: The following sections focus on big picture trends. Since space here is limited, I don’t describe specific search and recruitment techniques. Another time, another place!

Making Placements in 1984

Signs of the Times: In 1984 Ronald Reagan won a landslide second presidential term as the “great communicator.” His supply side economics and tax cuts stimulated the economy and created jobs. High inflation and interest rates were the norm (the prime rate was about 12.5%), but times were better than the no-growth stagflation of the 1970′s. Aiding growth was a drop in gasoline prices from a high of $1.30 per gallon in 1982 to $.90 in 1986.

The fax machine wasn’t yet widely used by most American businesses (even though it was invented in 1843 before the telephone!) Microsoft introduced its Windows operating system in 1983 and personal computers appeared more a novelty than a business tool. Typewriters were more common than PC’s. The Soviet Union was still the Soviet Union.

Large search firms worked nationally and internationally because they had offices in many cities. Smaller firms tended to work locally in cities or regions. As a result, most recruiters met with clients and candidates in-person. This solidified relationships.

The Approach: New clients and candidates were found by telephone and networking. (“Tried and true” techniques that won’t ever go out of.) New job leads were found in newspaper and trade journalified ads. Phone numbers (vital information to recruiters) were found in industry directories, the yellow pages or through telephone operators. Imagine now sitting down at your desk with no computer to turn on. Only the phone. This might be a good idea for many today to increase productivity and earnings!

Information about clients and candidates were written and stored on 3 x 5 index cards categorized in desk-top file holders. (Remember those boxes?) Paper resumes were stored in file cabinets, organized alphabetically or by discipline.

In those days, resumes weren’t sent often to clients. Verbal presentations secured interviews. Written fee agreements weren’t yet standard practice. Since there was no physical tracking of information, legal issues inevitably flared up. Some say practices were less ethical than today; making placements was more “hard core” sales. Closing candidates was more direct such as, “Let me tell you why you should take this job.”

The Numbers: Placements were made mostly by instinct and intuition. Short-term results (closed sales) carried greater weight than longer-term strategies (relationship development). Measurement tools were basic:

Calls per day.
Job orders per week.
Candidates recruited per week.
Placements and billings per month.

In the 1980s and before, strong relationships were built based on a person’s word. The same holds true today and for the future: Our word must be our bond.

Making Placements in 1994

Signs of the Times: In 1994 the U.S. was enjoying a “peace dividend” as the world’s sole superpower — from the end of the cold war and the breakup of the Soviet Union. This gave President Clinton the latitude to “reinvent” government with deficit reduction, welfare reform and small business tax cuts. The prime rate in 1994 rose from 6% to 8.5%, reflecting a resurging economy. Gas prices were about the same levels in 1994 as they were a decade earlier (lower in inflation adjusted terms). It was the start of a multi-year bull run for the job market — a golden era for search and placement.

The personal computer was making its way to recruiters’ desks. As a stand alone, non-networked machine with little storage capability, its use as a productive tool was limited to data processing (resume writing and spreadsheets). 1994 was the year that Netscape’s precursor company, Mosaic Communications, built the first web browser. (Al Gore had not yet invented the Internet.) Though, the coming “information superhighway” was about to explode as no one anticipated.

At the same time, the world was getting smaller. NAFTA was passed in the mid 90′s creating a North American free trading region. NATO accepted former Eastern bloc nations. Europe was preparing for its monetary union and Hong Kong for its handover to China. Globalization was the watchword as old barriers were breaking down.

The Approach: Making placements was becoming less sale-sy and more consultative. Information stored in databases assisted in engaging clients and candidates. “Private” information the kind that leads to placements — still came from the tried and true methods: Sourcing by phone and effective networking.

Managing information was always the ticket to increased earnings.

Now the PC could do it efficiently at low cost.

Some firms built rudimentary databases early on. Others bought the first industry-specific database packages. With contact management software, firms could now more effectively follow up with prospective clients and candidates by logging personalized data, e.g., birthday, kid’s names, favorite sports team. And they could better track their own activity, empowering consultants to self-manage.

The Numbers: Activity-based analysis and “management by the numbers” were becoming standard. Measurement tools were expressed in ratios:

Sendouts to placements.
New job orders to placements.
Recruited candidates to placements.
Total billings to placements.

Search firms became aware of a powerful combination: Information management was central to a longer-term relationship strategy and productivity could be improved by managing results.

Making Placements in 2004

Signs of the Times: The boom years of the mid-to-late ’90′s created over 15 million new jobs, primarily in the service sector and technology-based fields in IT, communication services and bio-sciences.

The party came to an end after the year 2000. The stock market bubble popped. Financial scandals rocked the corporate world. The events of 9/11/2001 led to Mid East wars. Gasoline prices spiked to over $2.50 per gallon in some areas.

A perfect storm created a crisis in confidence.

Three million jobs were lost from 2001 through the first half of 2003. Corporate layoffs were a sign of the times. Although no specific figures are available, an informal survey reveals that over 50% of search consultants exited the business and nearly 1/3 of all firms closed shop. The largest search firms dripped millions in red ink, while many smaller firms were reduced to skeleton staffs.

With the combination of fewer jobs and top talent itching for new opportunities, companies used the Internet job boards to fill open positions. Companies also used the opportunity to data dump tens of thousands of resumes into their corporate databases. In addition, third party recruiters went to work in the corporate world and began putting to use proven search techniques. All in the attempt to save budgets, control expenses and save the CEO’s job.

With an eye toward reelection and to stimulate the economy, George Bush II cut taxes while boosting military spending to fight terrorist wars. With inflation non-existent, the Federal Reserve dropped interest rates to 45 year lows (a 1% prime rate) which boosted economic growth and rekindled the job market. The massive fiscal and monetary stimulus boosted demand and led to over one million new jobs created from Q2 ’03 to the Q2 ’04. For those who survived, as some say “the worst job market in 30 years,” the Internet created new rules of the game.

The Approach: With networked PC’s, powerful databases, digital high speed Internet all at low costs — search firms can now “data mine” and manage information more efficiently than ever before. Key contacts are downloaded from corporate websites. Firms tap into on-line candidate databases to make them their own. The “Internet Researcher” is a valued member of the search team.

Today most agree business is bouncing back. But somehow it’s different. Tougher to get higher fees. Clients are more demanding, very selective and taking a longer time to make hiring decisions. At the same time, top candidates have many options. In high demand niches and geographies (e.g., legal in the Northeast corridor, bankers in the Sunbelt and heath-care nationwide), times are very good, because talent is scare. The premium, again, is reverting back to the relationship with the candidate.

Those who survived the last three years are adapting to a new data-rich, Internet world. Top consultants are asking more insightful questions before accepting search assignments. In working with candidates, they are screening rigorously before taking action. Behavior-based interviewing, testing motivation and covert reference checking are becoming common practices.

Search firms are harnessing the Internet to offer clients value.

Firms are developing a long-term relationship development strategy in conjunction with building a brand that stands the test of time. To demonstrate value, search consultants must be management consultants, industry experts, trusted advisors and career developers.

For candidates:
What are the true motivating factors which will prompt a career move?
How can we raise their confidence and prepare them for interviews?
How can we advise them on their career goals?

For clients:

How can we make their lives easier?
What’s the “value proposition” of our service?
What industry and competitor knowledge can we offer?

Building brand loyalty is paramount to establishing exclusive relationships.

These are the kind of relationships in which clients call us first with new search assignments. And, the kind where top candidates call us with jobs they want — whether they be with specific companies of interest or whether they find the leads on the Internet. We know we have the right relationship, when candidates see the value of the service we provide.

The Numbers: The combination of the Internet’s impact and the recent job market has made search firms rethink their business models. Productivity metrics are used to manage profitability:

Quality search assignments per 100 calls.
Top tier, placeable candidates recruited per 100 calls.
New client and candidate calls per hour.
Billings per time period (hourly, daily, weekly).

With job boards prevalent and candidates exploring multiple opportunities, search consultants are getting wiser. They are developing exclusive relationships with clients and candidates by asking, listening and delivering what their “customers” want. The by-product is a stream of valuable referrals into the future. Many know it well: Focus on your customer and the bottom line takes care of itself.

Making Placements in 2014

Signs of the Times: In 2012 the U.S. elects its first female president. (Guesses anyone?) Interest and inflation rates are low by historical standards — in the mid single digits — as “information everywhere” continues to reign in price pressures.

In 2014 the service sectors dominate. Greater than the influence of technology are demographic trends. Aging baby boomers stretch the U.S. social security trust fund to the limit. Energetic seniors demand higher levels of service in healthcare, hospitality and financial areas. (Good disciplines to specialize in.)

Impending Crisis: Too Many Jobs and Too Few People (a book published in 1993) accurately forecasts the U.S. labor market. In 2010 there are 167 million open jobs with only 157 million people to fill them: A shortfall of 10 million. The largest growing occupations are in computer services. The greatest shortage is in healthcare.

In select niches, search fees rise to 40%+.

The U.S., still the sole economic and military world power, is losing ground to China and the Far East. The world has partitioned into three primary trading blocks: The Americas, Europe and Asia, including the sub-continent. 80% of all U.S. manufacturing is outsourced to low cost, newly-developed countries. Ever since gas prices hit $4.00 per gallon in 2010, OPEC’s influence has diminished. Advanced energy sources hydrogen, solar and wind are feeding an increasingly power hungry world.

The Approach: Visual Communication Devices (VCD’s) have a profound impact on the way search consultants do business. The phone and keyboard of a decade earlier are obsolete. PC’s now double as video-phones. Great leaps in bandwidth and storage capability enable sending digital audio and video messages instantly, globally.

Standard IT formats morph from words to images. Clients and candidates can observe our presentation from anywhere. When we meet “face-to-face,” we can see them and they can see us. We no longer refer resumes to clients. We conduct, record, save and send digital video interviews.

As the world becomes increasing smaller, physical location is less important. Distance and time are squeezed. Virtual offices and flexible office arrangements become the norm. The “wireless world” connects all seamlessly. Large search firms are dispersed into virtual deal teams. The major job boards no longer exist in their former forms: In the talent drought, they were not producing value relative to their costs.

With all the technological advancement, search firms thrive because humans like to deal with humans. Artificial intelligence is still decades away.

Brand and brainpower are the new capital.

In 2014 there are half the search consultants practicing as compared to the height of the late 1990′s. This is not a reflection of the times. In fact, the shortage of service sectors jobs is creating tremendous demand for search services. Rather, firms large and small across a wide spectrum of industries bring in-house highly skilled consultants to save costs. CEO’s have gotten wise: Human capital is viewed universally as the most valuable of all corporate assets. And companies now pay up for the best search talent.

Independent search consultants are now management consultants — in not only talent acquisition but also talent retention. Clients work with fewer consulting firms and are screened for fit — culturally, ethically and in working-style — before engagements are granted. Since most HR functions have been eliminated, search consultants are seen as outsourced employees. Human capital is viewed by C-levels as a strategic imperative.

The term, recruiter, is used less and less.

Top search consultants are career managers.

In 2014, consultants no longer “recruit.” They grow “communities of networks.” They accomplish this by developing enduring relationships with top-performing candidates in the same way sports agents have done with athletes for decades. They focus — not on the next placement — but rather on how they can assist candidates in achieving their career goals.

The Numbers: To quantify and track results in this high demand, talent-short world, new client-centric criteria are used:

% time spent on high value, customer-focused activities.
Exclusive candidate agent contracts signed per month.
Repeat client engagements per quarter.
Client and candidate satisfaction scores.

In summary, the placement-focused model of the 1980s transforms into a client-centric one by the second decade of the 21st century. Performance and activity is still managed by the numbers.

The shift is in what’s being measured. Quantity of results (e.g., sendout volume) is replaced by quality of experience (e.g., client and candidate satisfaction). Those who adapt profit more and build wealth.

What’s in store for the search industry in 2024 and beyond? Use your leadership and visionary abilities. Email me your predictions at mramer@ramergroup.com and I’ll return send my “Double Your Billings Scorecard.”

TFL archives

The Fatal Assumption



fordyce-default

The Fatal assumption:

One of the biggest reasons that so many small businesses fail is that they lack a clear system of operation. Michael Gerber, author of the E-myth, talked about what he calls the “fatal assumption” that many business owners make. It goes something like this; because you understand how to do work of a recruiter you therefore assume that you understand how to run a successful recruiting business. Or put another way, because you are a great chef, you assume that you will automatically be a successful restaurateur. This erroneous thinking is a big part of the reason why 80% of all small businesses fail in first 5 years. Many owners are “winging it” instead of building a business from a systems point of view.

A systems mindset:

A systems mindset will make your firm much more efficient and will reduce turnover and wasted time. The beauty of systems is that if you take the time to document a function properly, let’s say how to take a flawless search assignment, and enforce its execution, you never have to create it from scratch again. Small business owners will earn more profit in less time if they focus on system solutions to their business frustrations. Systems can and should be simple and can be created and implemented quickly.

A few definitions:

System: a documented way of performing a task that solves a problem and ensures that the task is performed properly and consistently.

Frustration: a frustration in your business is an undesirable pattern of events that can be eliminated by installing a system.

Why do you need systems?

Some grim statistics:

- 57% of all small businesses fail in first year.

- As mentioned above, 80% of all small businesses fail within the first 5 years.

- 80% of those that survive the first 5 years are gone after the second 5 years.

- 80% of recruiters that you hire will not be with you after 12 months (if you’re an average firm).

What if we said the cure rate for an experimental surgery was 20%? Or there is an 80% chance that you’ll lose your 100K investment by going ahead with a proposed venture? Or you should hire this applicant even though he’s been fired by 80% of his employers? How many people would sign on with such odds? And yet, these are the odds of making it for most new business owners.

Franchise statistics:

Franchises have exploded in the last 30 years and have been extremely successful. Here’s a staggering statistic, 80% of all franchises succeed in first 5 years. So let’s contrast the difference in the failure rate between small businesses and franchises: 80% of all small businesses fail in the first 5 years and 80% of all franchises succeed in the first 5 years. You don’t have to be a genius to realize that there is a strong message being sent by those numbers.

Here’s the #1 difference between the two: franchises rely on systems that have been perfected and proven over time and most small businesses operate without documented systems. Some franchises are a complete waste of money for their members but compared to your average entrepreneur, their success rate is much higher.

Systems solutions:

Becoming systems oriented is at first a mental mind shift. You have to begin to view problems and frustrations as being cause by the lack of a good system as opposed to simple “people failure.” So for example, when you realize that you are spending too much time going through useless resumes you’d say to yourself: “What system am I missing that would solve this problem?” Or, if you can’t motivate you or your staff to consistently be on the phone, you’d ask, “What system am I missing that would ensure that my team is bringing in 5 new clients per month?”

All successful businesses are nothing more or less than a collection of well running systems. So, your job as a business owner is to design your business so that it runs like a finely tuned watch.

To do that, you must begin to think of your business as a collection of systems that is apart from you, rather than just a part of you.

Many owners operate as if their business is nothing more than a glorified job so part of the shift is looking at yourself and your role in a new way. As the E-myth says, you must go to work on your business rather than simply in it. You need to think about your business systemically, rather than personally.

Conclusion

A systems mindset will give the owner more freedom, less headaches and will help to build equity in the firm. This one idea is the core of the entire franchise industry that has exploded over the last 30 years. As an owner, this concept can provide you with security and freedom as much or more than any other strategy that you can employ. I’ll write more about systemization in future articles.

TFL archives

Quit And Win! – How To Reduce Staff Turnover



fordyce-default

He had many years of experience as the successful owner/manager of a fine firm, yet he had a problem. “It’s not that I hire the wrong people,” he said to me. “It’s that I keep the wrong people too long.”

To coin a phrase, “He ain’t the only one!” Were a long-tenured owner/manager to add up his cumulative costs over his time in business, putting aside only commissions paid to consultants, it is probable that his highest expenditure would be not rent, not phone, not furniture. Rather, it would be the lost draws, social security, unemployment payments, phone, and business costs associated with ultimately unsuccessful consultants!

Moreover, in addition to tangible costs, that owner would have such items as time, emotional drain on both manager and office, lost deals (not always known), negative client reactions to a poor consultant, the fact that another person on the same desk could have been doing much better, candidates not recruited who might have been placed by someone else in the office. . . The expense of an unsuccessful consultant is truly staggering.

As our market continues to improve and we add to staff, we can expect a spate of tests, services, and consultants purporting to improve your odds in the selection of new employees. Bad idea. For some years, heavy testing was in vogue amongst many major corporations. Huge amounts were spent in an attempt to arrive at a formula or test which predicted success. Consistently poor or mediocre results have cause most of these firms to drop the testing programs. They have been weighed extensively and found wanting. Thirty-five years ago, Charles B. Roth, one of America‘s finest sales trainers and business authors, wrote, “The weakness of aptitude tests lies in the fact that they can’t tell much about intention; the important thing is a man’s willingness to throw himself whole-heartedly into the job.” This statement remains as true today as the day it was written.

What, then, is the answer? Given the assumption that the selection process and the initial training must both be as excellent as possible, what else can be done to prevent “keeping the wrong people too long?”

I believe that rigid adherence to a system of progressive and quantifiable steps of elimination will help any organization. The earlier an individual who lacks the necessary ingredients for success can be identified and eliminated, the more we can concentrate our time and money on those who deserve it and the greater our profits.

Following are some ideas to consider accomplishing just that:

Screening Interest

Perhaps the key factor involved in success in our business is a willingness to learn. Regardless of talent or even background, this business must be learned by serious study. The reason the “born salesman” is so seldom successful in search and recruiting is the long learning curve involved; a glib consultant unwilling to work hard to learn tends to be a “shooting star” of short duration.

Specific questions should be asked about this when checking references. However, beyond this, there is a simple way of testing for this vital quality. Give the prospective consultant a book on this industry to read, and see how enthusiastically he or she dives into it. A person determined to succeed will absorb the book rapidly, read some chapters twice, and come back with questions. A future failure will probably read very little.

There are several excellent books out on this industry now, the most recent being Larry Nobles’ well-written comprehensive work, “Search and Placement! A Handbook for Success” (www.larrynobles.com). Its obvious use is as a training manual and reference guide for every consultant. However, it will be found to be an effective “screening tool” for new people as well.

Don’t just “let the consultant read the book.” Give it to them, dated, signed, and inscribed (“To Bob, A future superstar”) by the manager. A serious person will highlight and underline it. See what happens. That’s how you determine Charles B. Roth’s previously-mentioned “most important thing” at an early stage.

Pre-Hiring

A well-respected individual with a major franchise organization recommends having the potential consultant make 25 to 50 calls (for example: Marketing calls) to a pre-determined list of prospects before hiring. This individual says he is not concerned with the results; he is concerned with how rapidly the potential consultant hits the phone and the amount of time spent between calls. Too much reluctance eliminates the candidate from contention.

While I have never personally utilized this method, it seems well worth considering as an early eliminator.

First Two Weeks

1. In the early stages of training, a series of daily written tests will help identify those who will be ultimately unsuccessful in our business at a very early stage, despite a rigorous selection process. This method has allowed those firms utilizing it to eliminate 25 to 35% of those hired in the first week. Barring major personal traumas, poor scores always indicate either a lack of intelligence or a lack of commitment (they didn’t study). Either eliminates a prospective consultant from eventual success and from further employment.

2. A written structured evaluation should be conducted at two weeks. While it is not possible to predict with certainty a “winner” at this time, it is frequently possible to predict a “loser.” Habit patterns such as arriving late and leaving early, not studying training material, poor voice or speech patterns, inattentiveness during sales meetings or formal training, and many other problems are unlikely to change. For a sample two-week evaluation form visit the author’s website (www.stevefinkel.com) and see the article

“The Early Evaluation”.

First Month

1. Every firm should have a good daily planner. (Planners are available for sale through our firm). Especially in a new consultant, a consistent reluctance to fill out the daily planner indicates an unwillingness to take direction, to follow the system, and to pay the price necessary for success in our industry. Termination of the new employee is indicated.

2. The new employee must keep track of his numbers. The manager should have minimum acceptable numbers each week which have been written out before the new employee comes on board. If the minimum number of calls is consistently not achieved, the employee lacks commitment. Early termination is the answer.

3. Correct Role-Playing should be a mandatory and on-going part of every training program (see “From Knowing to Doing: How to Implement” on author’s website for complete information). If the new consultant does not do well in role-playing, he cannot do well “for real.” Consistently poor performance in role-playing with no sign of improvement is a clear indication of qualities which do not indicate future success.

First Quarter

1. Minimum acceptable billings should also be determined and written out before the new employee comes on board. This will obviously vary depending on the firm, as a clerical desk will produce billings more rapidly that a technical desk, for example. The manager must determine what is acceptable for his firm, must write out his minimum anticipated results, and must rigorously eliminate those who fail to achieve these results.

2. Formal reviews of the fledgling consultant must be done at 30, 60, and 90 days. The consultant must be told his strengths, his weaknesses, and what is expected of him in terms of hard numbers during the next 30-day period. These expectations must be written out by the manager and put in the consultant’s file (copy to the consultant optional). This step will stop the old “he hasn’t produced any billings, but he’s got a lot going on” feeling at 90, 120, and even 150 days, as the investment in an unprofitable consultant spirals. Consistent failure to achieve pre-determined quantifiable minimum objectives necessitates termination . . .and the earlier, the better.

These suggestions, with the emphasis upon early elimination, may appear to be harsh to some. They are not. The pre-determined minimum objectives must be realistic, attainable, and based on knowledge of what has been achieved by others. To do otherwise is counter-productive. Given the fairness of the goals, however, the owner-manager must base his decisions as to the continued employment of new consultants upon quantifiable results at early stages of development.

As the market improves and recruiting firms add to their staff, many lessons of the past will have been forgotten by experienced managers or never learned to begin with by newer ones. There is no better lesson than learning how to make appropriate and logical decisions on new people with your firm.

Any improvement in the selection of consultants and in our initial training program will obviously benefit us; however, only by rigid adherence to a planned program of early termination predicated upon realistic minimum numbers can we truly develop our firmsand our profit margins to the maximum!