Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Articles tagged 'fee agreements'

Fees, Jeff's On Call!

Jeff’s On Call!: Enforcing Old Fee Agreements



law_gavel

This week’s inquiry comes from Tarin Yankovich:

Hello Jeff,

First off, I have been a fan of you and the Fordyce articles you write for years, thank you for all your great advice! Your experience and wisdom have giving me the foresight on numerous occasions to avoid situations that would have otherwise cost my firm valuable business. Here is a recent question that came up; I thought you’d be the perfect person to shed some light on it for me and possibly your readers.

I run a search firm in Los Angeles and run a national practice within the Finance space. We work with many of the largest finance companies in the world. As most, our business goes in cycles with clients, meaning we’ll do many searches with a client one year and the next we won’t. As a result, sometimes a couple years go by during which time we won’t work with a client but still have contracts with them.

I have one particular client I worked with in 2007; we did many VP level searches for them and they were happy with our results. At the time I had several contacts at various levels within the organization in Chicago, Boston, and New York.  Since the 2009 recession and with a myriad of internal changes at the company literally all of my original contacts both in HR and management have moved on, their assistants have moved on, and even the President of the firm has moved on. Additionally, the firm changed their name a couple years ago using hyphenated name, and recently the firm has dropped the old name altogether and only uses the new one.

Here is my dilemma, I have continued to call on the firm and know who most of the new players are.  Recently I found an open door and am trying to rekindle this relationship with a new search assignment. I don’t want to lose momentum with a new contract if I don’t have to. I have a signed contract, my contract (not theirs), from several years ago, at a percentage I really like. I don’t want to haggle with a new HR person, renegotiate a good contract, and possibly lose the search or get a lower fee than I negotiated pre-recession. However I’m smart enough to see a couple possible issues. I have a contract, with no expiration date, which is signed by a signatory who is no longer there, under a name that the firm no longer uses. I do have some wording that says should the signatory leave his position the contract is still valid, but I fear I’m facing a few issues and want to make sure I’m covered. So, is my contract still valid?

Any guidance would be much appreciated.  Thank you Jeff!

Tarin

Fees, Jeff's On Call!

Get Paid When the Candidate Accepts



money by Andrew Magill

Contingency fee recruiting has grown over the past 50 years into the largest segment of the placement industry. While today’s search firms bear little resemblance to the applicant-paid employment agencies that spawned them, one vestige remains: The fee is not considered due until the candidate actually starts. An “instant fall-off” means no fee.

It’s s though you’ve loaded a “feeshooter” and aimed it at your foot. You’re just waiting to pull the trigger when something happens between the acceptance and the start. It takes just one instant five-figure falloff to make you vow to never hobble away again.

We’ve been changing this since 1985 when we introduced it to TFL subscribers after a beta test with clients. It has worked very well. Nobody’s ever been arrested. Their success and our refinements over 25 years can now be yours.

Jeff's On Call!

Jeff’s On Call!: Employer-Mandated PSAs



fordyce-default

This week’s inquiry comes from Fran Pollack:

Hello Jeff,

I am an avid reader of the Fordyce Letter and I have a question for you. I am the owner of a permanent placement and staffing company. I know that the Fordyce Letter is geared toward permanent placement, but hopefully, you will be able to answer this question regarding staffing.

It appears that more and more of our clients, as well as new clients calling in, are sending us THEIR agreements to sign vs. signing our standard fee agreements. In these agreements of theirs, they want us to sign our life away. They way us to sign their Indemnity Agreements/hold harmless agreements leaving the staffing company to assume all the risks from sexual harassment, discrimination, and liability of their cargo and equipment.

I get on the phone with them and explain that they are the co-employer and that they also have to assume responsibility for the workers we send to them.

I am not signing them, therefore, they are turning to other agencies who will sign them. I am losing business.

I would appreciate any feedback that you can give me. Thank you.

Fran Pollack

Uncategorized

Jeff on Call: The Fee-agreement Signer Left



fordyce-default

Q: Your Fee Collection Guide always comes in handy! I recently collected full fee on a sticky situation I’d been dealing with late last year. My fee agreements are open-ended. They don’t expire. Is the fee agreement still valid if the person who signed it at the “client” company has left? I assume that it’s best to have the signature of a current employee, but that leaves me open to renegotiations and delays.

Before you read this, get the stickum off that Fee Collection Guide! It might be worth something some day. (Actually it must already be worth at least a few million dollars in collected fees to readers.)

Your signed fee schedule is valid regardless of who signed it, when they signed it, and what their position was with the client (if any). Yes — the janitor can bind his employer if he signs and sends. In fact, the copier technician just passin’ through on his way to the roach coach can. Even the the HR lady’s psychotherapist who picked up your fee schedule while conducting an on-site sensitivity training session, took it back to his office, then signed and faxed it back.

Isn’t this fun? Cr-a-a-a-zy, ay? The rule is: NO STRIP SEARCH BEFORE A SEARCH. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN “UNAUTHORIZED HIRING AUTHORITY.” It’s such a happy hunting world when everyone is authorized!

Your lawyer doesn’t know this stuff, so please remember it for as long as you’re in the biz:

There are only two kinds of authority (ways an individual binds another individual or business). They are

  1. Actual Authority. This means the employer expressly authorized the janitor to sign and return recruiter fee agreements. Or maybe management just knew he was doing so and did nothing (or smiled approvingly), and thereby impliedly authorized the signing and returning. Either way, the employer is estopped (stopped) from asserting that the janitor wasn’t authorized.
  2. Apparent Authority. In our happy hunting world, everyone is authorized. If you like the phrase apparent authority, use it. But beware: lawyers never have just one polysyllabic phrase when two will do.

So you might want to complicate this simple concept by also using the phrase ostensible authority. Personally, I like it better because “ostensible” rhymes with “sensible,” and I can point that out to opposing counsel. It sends them charging to LegalZoom.com for free advice.

Anyhoo, the janitor fired for embezzlement from that company acquired three years ago just earned you a five-figure fee!

Great question that everyone wonders. Now, go for it!

Success always,

Jeff