Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Technology

Industry News, Social Media

Monster Gets More Social Adding “Friends” To Its Listings



Monster logo

Monster took another step last week in its drive to become more social adding a “friends” connection to the thousands of listings on its jobs board.

Almost a year after launching BeKnown, its Facebook-based business network and competitor to BranchOut, Monster is now enabling its network members to see who they know at companies offering jobs on Monster.com.

It works just as you expect: Job seekers searching Monster are invited to “See who you know.” A click pops up a list of their BeKnown connections who work at the company. Those not already on BeKnown get an invitation to join, needing only a Facebook login.

This is not likely to be a significant benefit to search firms or 3rd party recruiters. Typically, these searches are confidential, and rarely are they posted to the general interest commercial boards, anyway. However, it’s clearly an effort by Monster to be more competitive with BranchOut and LinkedIn. 

Technology

TalentBin Pulls Together Talent Profiles To Make Sourcing A Snap



TalentBin logo

TalentBin officially launched from private beta to public this week. The service, which bills itself as a talent search engine, said it “just turned the entire professional web into the largest talent sourcing database known to mankind with its public launch.”

If you’ll excuse the bravado, what TalentBin is trying to do is actually quite impressive and has leaped forward since I saw the beginnings of its private beta at the HR Technology Conference last October.

What it is trying to do is fairly simple: create a searchable database that merges information about a person from all over the web into a single profile so that recruiters can get all of the information about them in one, digestible place.

Industry News, Social Media

How Techies Use Social Media And How That Can Help You



social media illustration

There seems to be this overarching assumption that the way the general populace uses social media is the same way that technical talent will use social media. And while that might be true on a larger scale (for example, social networks as a whole are gaining more members and more professional members at the same time), is it really true on a more tactical and operational level?

The folks over at GlobalSpec put out a report recently on the “industrial use” of social networks. And while the report is geared more towards marketers and sales professionals, there’s much in the report for recruiters. First, let’s touch on LinkedIn. 

Industry News, Social Media

LinkedIn Adding Features, Touting Early “Pipeline” Success



LinkedInTalent Pipeline

LinkedIn is introducing something it calls “Targeted Updates” and “Follower Statistics” with a select group of early release partners, kind of like it tested the “Pipeline” product with a charter group.

First, let’s talk Pipeline. Talent Pipeline

That’s the LinkedIn product for “CRM” — sometimes considered “candidate relationship management” in the recruiting field. We talked to some of the charter members of the testing group. Johanna Danaher and Pfizer, for example, are heavy LinkedIn users and Pipeline testers, and like that it’s more customizable than applicant tracking systems tend to be.

Red Hat is pretty bullish on Pipeline. Red Hat’s L.J. Brock likes the fact that the company’s using a system for CRM that is already so ingrained in its recruiters’ daily lives. He’s noticing some of the things we’ve all noticed or heard: for example, that emails sent via LinkedIn have proliferated, so it can be tougher to get people to open and respond to them. And that some people have more skeletal profiles, but that those people — more passive, less likely to spend time updating LinkedIn — tend to be some of the better Red Hat candidates.

Jim Schnyder headed up Pepsi’s rollout of Pipeline, and has worked LinkedIn on improvements to the product. He says it’s a “game-changer” and writes:

Here’s an example of how I foresee using this tool in future. Let’s say I routinely recruit accountants in the Boulder, Colorado area. I can run a targeted search using the Linked Recruiter technology to get to that population. Separately, I can network outside of LinkedIn using any of my other favorite sources, gather leads in an excel template, and upload them to Talent Pipeline. Many of them will already have LinkedIn profiles, and the system will automatically match them. Others won’t, and that’s OK; LinkedIn will create a record that lives in my system only (not on the public LinkedIn platform).

As time goes by, I can return to this pool, keep in touch with them, and when I’m hiring another CPA in the Boulder area nine months from now, I know exactly where to start. I can filter within that group and selectively send out messages, more or less tapping them on the shoulder to see if they’re interested or know of someone … I can imagine this same technology being used to help us set up all sorts of similar talent pools – drawing on graduating classes from targeted business schools/colleges, for example, and other populations that can be hard to keep in touch with as they change jobs, locations and even names.

The New Tools

Products called “Follower Statistics” and “Targeted Updates” are another addition that LinkedIn is testing out right now. LinkedIn has been doing some research on users that use the follow company feature (a product that has been around for a year and a half). From the user’s perspective, the ability to follow a company is fairly straight forward. You can choose to receive updates when the company posts a new job or when people add or drop the company from their LinkedIn profile. You could also subscribe to any status updates that the company posts.

For the company being followed though, there was little in the way of advantages for this feature. Companies could get a list of people who are following them but there was really no rhyme or reason to how the list is presented (and for those with large followings — like IBM with over 600,000 followers — the list is virtually useless).

Targeted updates is a step forward in using the follow company feature for the company’s benefit. The new feature can help dissect the list of people following a company (similar to the way people searching on LinkedIn can be targeted) and allow recruiters to send specific updates to those people. That means instead of a company posting a status update to everyone following them with a new job focused on EMEA marketing based in London, you could simply reduce your list down to those who may best fit that profile and send it to them specifically. And with follower statistics, companies will be able to track the effectiveness of campaigns to build followers and reach out to people using this feature.

All of this seems focused on giving companies incentive to build followers the same way a company might use a Facebook fan page or a company-specific Twitter account. LinkedIn is banking on the fact that better targeting, messaging, and analytics will differentiate it enough from other social media possibilities.

Early test companies of both these new tools include L’Oreal, Starbucks, Expedia, CH2M Hill, and SAIC.

Technology

A 99-cent ATS That Will “Change the Face of Recruiting”



FindHire

The language is lofty: a new applicant tracking system claims it will “change the face of the recruiting business.”

We’re not sure we buy that yet, but FindHire is certainly worth a look. And at 99 cents — for the iPad app, or about $100-$200 monthly for a few users on the web version — to get started, there’s not a lot of risk. It’s an ATS with a user-friendly appearance for recruiters, a separate look for candidates, and all meant to look like so-called “Web 2.0″ sites (aren’t we on 3.0 yet?).

CEO/co-founder Michael Dennis (who came from a boutique recruiting firm) provided a look inside the site. You can do things like create your own little job board; import candidates from social media sites; look through resumes; schedule interviews; use videoconferencing to interview people; send out mass emails; send out an offer and have it signed digitally; and, keep track of analytics like interview-to-offer ratios.

Industry News, Social Media

Newspaper Help-Wanteds: All But Gone



Newspaper employment revenue 2011

Remember when you spent Mondays fielding calls prompted by your help-wanted ad  in the Sunday paper?

It wasn’t that long ago — not even a dozen years ago — that newspapers were where  recruitment dollars went. In 2000, the watershed year for newspaper employment advertising, the take came to nearly $9 billion, and some newspapers — the Dallas Morning News and the (San Jose) Mercury News in particular — had Sunday jobs  sections  larger than today’s entire editions.

Last year, according to the Newspaper Association of America, employment advertising revenue was $743.4 million, far below the combined $1.1 billion in North American revenue of industry leaders CareerBuilder and Monster. The last time newspaper employment revenue was so low was in 1977 when it totaled $589.4 million. In today’s dollars, that would be $2.2 billion.

Social Media

Too Good for Job Boards? Try Using Them in Tandem With LinkedIn



Neil Lebovits

I cannot believe how many of my clients/followers tell me that they don’t or won’t use job boards because their clients either won’t pay for job board candidates or don’t want to see job board candidates. Many tell me with a gleeful condescension that they simply “don’t do the boards.”

All of you should be using job boards.

Why should you make this a key part of your strategy? Isn’t LinkedIn enough?

Technology

Recruiting Software Poised for Innovation in 2012



laptop

The increasingly diverse needs of organizations big and small demand a myriad of options in recruiting software solutions. Recent activity—including Salesforce’s acquisition of Rypple—is pumping new energy into this niche market. In the last month, VC funds have been flowing into the human resources software market, with large investments in SmartRecruiters and iCIMS. I’ve taken an in-depth look at how this dynamic software market will be impacted, how vendors will be poised for greater success, as well as how all of this may affect users.

Social Media, Technology

Klout and Recruitment



Klout-logo

For years employers have been screening candidates based on content on social networking websites. Candidates using poor judgment online may be screened out of the process.  Now employers and recruiters are turning to social media to aid in the selection of knowledgeable and well-connected employees.

Klout measures an individual’s influence across social media entities, such as Twitter.  Data under consideration are network size, amount of content generated, and volume of interaction. That data is processed to produce a Klout score ranging from 1 to 100.  The higher the score, presumably the higher the individual’s social media influence.  Klout scores are categorized into measures, including “True Reach” (size of engaged audience), “Amplification Probability” (rate of action taken on message, such as retweets), and “Network Score” (value of a person’s engaged audience).

Relationships, Technology

The Best of The Fordyce Letter 2011, #2 — Get Out From Behind the Desk and Network



man_atdesk

Editor’s note: Paul DeBettignies’ article was the 2nd most popular article on The Fordyce Letter in 2011. It originally ran in March.

I know, I know… smile and dial.

More phone calls equal more job orders, candidates and send outs. More send outs equal more placements.

I get it – I really do. But after thirteen years as a sole practitioner, I have learned that I need to get out from behind the desk every now and then, or I fear that the headset will become permanently fixed to my head.