Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

What’s news?



fordyce-default

So..saving the meat of the matter for another time, let’s say that a recruiter/manager person publicly leveled accusations so serious and specific as to have someone spreading it via email use the word “unbelievable” in the subject line of the email and report it to NAPS etc. Thinking it to be unbelievable in a more literal sense, I asked someone who knew the accused who had him explain the situation to me. After the semi-public response that now makes it appear the original accuser should be tarred and feathered

Uncategorized

The Fordyce Forum



fordyce-default

Is everyone getting ready to go back to school in Vegas this June? Pack those bags. Call your travel agent, tell whoever you need to tell that June 4-6, “I’m out of the office”

In all seriousness, you should look at your calendar, and go book your flights. The Fordyce Forum is just around the corner. June 4-6 at the Flamingo Hotel, there will be a ton of information flowing.

It seems to me that the barrier to entry to become a recruiter today with a fistful of candidates to call thanks to the likes of LinkedIn has never been lower. The thing that keeps recruiters in business is knowing what to do when it needs to be done. Every day, being able to locate technically capable candidates seems to be easier and easier. I know some people will disagree but I stand by it.

The point in all of this is that in June, the 2nd edition of the Fordyce forum is bringing a host of smart recruiters together and smart trainers together to talk about recruiting. The networking opportunity is something that in my opinion warrants the price of admission let alone the speakers at the show.

The Fordyce Forum

Agenda

Speakers

changing topics for a moment but maybe not really, I have a friend that many of you may know named Bill Vick. Bill and I talk often and he has a great new site. It’s called XtremeRecruiting

 

Jon Bartos - Big Biller, Industry Leader
by: vPIP
Embed (copy & paste):

Uncategorized

Forecasting Your Staffing Needs for the Near Future



fordyce-default


Guest Post By Jim McGrath, The EMAC Group 

As the president of my recruiting firm, I see many human resources professionals needing to fill a vacant position spending hour after hour looking on sites like monster.com and careerbuilder.com, hunting and pecking for that elusive needle in a haystack. 

While that can be rewarding and inexpensive, it certainly does require much more time and effort, as well as a good neck and back massage. More importantly it takes away from administering benefits and nurturing and developing current employees. 

Today, you might be able to spare the time and costs of doing this work yourself.  In the very near future, however, the market is changing with baby boomers retiring, which started in 2005, is predicted to peak in 2011, and slowing sometime around 2020. 

What this will affect:

-        More positions to fill, especially highly trained, skilled and knowledgeable human capital;

-        Higher turnover as employees leave for other opportunities that were not available before;

-        Your company’s ability to grow, increase earnings and sales, and push quickly into new market opportunities. 

“…nearly one-in-five employers report it typically takes them two months or longer to fill their open positions and 40 percent say they currently have open positions for which they can’t find qualified candidates.”

-CareerBuilder.com’s “2008 Job Forecast,” conducted by Harris Interactive 

Consider this: with the increased vacant positions and employees hopping around, what will you have to do to keep your current employees happy? You time is going to be spent on attracting and retaining strategies, additional perks programs, increased paperwork, training…you name it. 

The time to plan is now. 

If you don’t already have a great relationship with at least one recruiting company you can trust, it’s time to start researching. Your recruiting and staffing partner can not only take those worries off your plate, but since this is their area of expertise, they are your best resource for knowing people in your industry, looking for a new opportunity. The saying goes, “The best jobs are often unadvertised.” That holds true for the best potential candidates too. 

Plan on an appropriate budget for your needs by talking to your recruiting and staffing partner who can help you make a decision based on their costs, your company strategies and determine the big picture. Working with a recruiting and staffing partner doesn’t have to cost a fortune if planned in advance and the relationship is a good reliable one. 

Lastly, try looking at smaller, niche job boards that have pre-screened candidates in your industry. Chances are, it will take much less time to get interviews in the hopper than searching endlessly through those well-known but time-consuming behemoths. You can spend more time at the masseuse for your enjoyment, rather than working out the kinks. 

Contact

Jim McGrath, President, The EMAC Group

142 W. Lakeview Ave., Ste. 2000

Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone 407-302-3622

Email: info@theemacgroup.com

Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

Another fun email exchange with a ‘candidate’



fordyce-default

I see people like this so rarely anymore that I tend to forget they exist. It used to be fun to ‘punish’ them for their stupidity but now I realize their attitude does that for them. I sent him this response to see whether he’ll choose ‘angry’ or ‘Oh, I see what you mean’. They usually run about 50/50.

Uncategorized

Employers and Recruiters Partnering in Harmony



fordyce-default


 Guest post by Jim McGrath, The EMAC Group

As the president of my recruiting firm, I have great relationships with many of my clients. We partner in the true sense of the word; that is, they expect I will give them quality results in a timely fashion and I expect them to give me a fair price for my work. 

That being said, there are times when a prospective client doesn’t know my company very well, or the recruiting and staffing business in general. More than likely, they have heard negative things or had negative experience and unfortunately my employees and I bear the brunt of this unfortunate happenstance. 

What can we do to truly partner and move forward in this instance? 

A good relationship with a recruiter can give you: 

- Reduction in overall hiring costs;

- Proven methodologies, recruiting techniques and sourcing that yield above average response;

- Experienced, successful and skilled recruiting personnel with years of industry knowledge;

- Enhanced interview activity levels;

- Improved industry visibility, increased market share and profitability;

- Qualified prospect leads. 

What I have found in my xx years in the recruiting business is that employers can have the best of both worlds, provided they create a good partnership with just one or two recruiting and staffing companies. What does that mean? 

1.     Tell your potential recruiting and staffing partners honestly and exactly what your needs, budget and time restraints are; they will tell you what a fair price is for the work.

2.     Compare this to a few other companies you are looking at and choose just one or two that are in line with your needs.

3.     Help your partner to understand your industry if you feel there are knowledge gaps. This can save valuable time and money for you both.

4.     Understand your recruiter’s business too. Ask questions if you don’t understand something they are doing or the way they do it.

5.     Bidding with multiple firms is not a good partnership strategy. This practice kills the motivation to recruit and causes the low quality, pressured sales approach. It’s not meant to be a race to find the Ideal Candidate for you; it’s meant to be careful and strategic – and permanent.

6.     Let your partner be the expert they are. Believe they are doing the best job possible for you. Does it matter that they found an Ideal Candidate on monster.com because you could have done it? The point is, the outcome has gotten you an Ideal Candidate, who is pre-screen and qualified. More often than not, good firms don’t use that as a sourcing strategy.

7.     Lastly, have a vested interest in creating a great partnership. Talk about any issues, but to summarily dismiss a recruiter doesn’t do anyone justice unless it’s just too big a faux pas. 

Just like any partnership, it takes time and involvement and a good deal of fine-tuning to create perfect harmony. Trust that with a little bit of work up front, on the back end you will have smooth sailing. 

Contact

Jim McGrath, President

142 W. Lakeview Ave., Ste. 2000

Lake Mary, FL 32746

Phone 407-302-3622

Email: info@theemacgroup.com

Industry News

Contract vs. Full-time Recruiters



fordyce-default

Alan Lee, who has been involved in recruiting (and downsizing) at Coca-Cola and NationsBank, and Gregg McCormick, a Gartner VP, share how their experiences in tough economic times have shaped their views on the use of contract recruiters vs. full-time recruiters.

Lee: In the downsizing at The Coca-Cola Company, we did have some contract recruiters on our team and when we knew we were going to cut back, we cancelled the contractors immediately. I think this was somewhat of a knee-jerk reaction on my part. It seemed logical, but the trouble is they were some of our best recruiters! I would recommend that companies have measurements in place to be able to rank the pool of recruiters, including contractors, and keep a blend of temporary and permanent recruiters. However, if you are a recruiting director and you don’t understand or actively engage in workforce planning to get your staffing plan, then you will at best be reactively accurate.

McCormick: I have a unique view on that. I do not view my talent pool, my recruiters, differently, whether they are in the variable workforce or full-time employees. I ask for the same ratios, the same ‘miles per gallon,’ the same number of candidates presented. So no, I wouldn’t be shifting my resources one way or the other. Whether I am offering a recruiter full-time status or a variable contract is decided at the time I bring them on my team.

Excerpted from the April issue of the Journal of Corporate Recruiting Leadership.

Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

LinkedIn’s move was no surprise to me…



fordyce-default

Interesting…the other comments in a Pinnacle Forum also seemed to interpret that I ‘didn’t see this coming”. I may have to both re-read and re-write that when I have time. This did not surprise me in the least and I remember distinctly thinking ‘yeah right’ the first time I heard someone (and later many more) suggest we should open our networks.

That might be fine for many people in many professions but for experienced, niched headhunters it is just plain, unarguably stupid. SO stupid that I just can’t wait to hear the other side.

Uncategorized

Hawkinson’s Homilies



fordyce-default

Paul Hawkinson has been doing this for a long time. He has a way with words and a way with ideas. I have never met him personally but I am hoping to in Las Vegas in June for the Fordyce Forum. Sit down, kick back, change into low gear and enjoy…

———————–

The better a recruiter tells you he’s doing, the closer he is to leaving the business. 

The frantic jobseeker who pesters you for six months to get him a better job out-of-town, will turn it down because his kid was just elected captain of the Little League team. 

The employer who says the normal fee is no problem will swear in court that you agreed to a 10% fee. 

The more solid a recruiter tells you a place­ment is, the less likely it’s true, especially if you’re on their back about lagging production. 

The perfect candidate will show up the day after another recruiter’s guy takes the job. 

Some of the finest works of fiction are those documents known as “hot sheets” or “pending placements.” 

The fancier the brochure or the flashier the website, the funkier the firm. 

Consistency is always easier to defend than correctness. 

The more some people toot their own horn, the more sour the sound. 

Why are so many well-trained people such poor doers? 

The only constant in our business is the fre­quency of change. 

Some managers force solutions to non-exis­tent problems. 

If you only trust yourself, make sure you’re trustworthy. 

Well-prepared placers are luckier. 

If the check is really in the mail, it will proba­bly arrive unsigned. 

Trying to be a first-rate recruiter without con­tinuous training is like trying to play Beethoven with a kazoo. 

Whenever an employer balks at paying a fee by saying, “It’s not the money, it’s the principle of the thing,” you know the real answer. 

Most bureaucrats who regulate our industry prove Darwin was wrong. 

If you don’t want to be treated like a doormat, don’t lie down. 

Boring people are always the first to return your phone calls. 

The more elegant the names that appear on a recruiter’s letterhead, the less likely any of them exist. 

A client’s jokes are always funny. 

Perfect candidate is an oxymoron. 

The amount of time required to perform a re­tained search assignment directly coincides with the timing of the final payment. 

Even the worst consultant isn’t completely useless so long as they can still be used as a bad example. 

On re-training burned-out consultants: At­tempting improvement is always admirable, but three times zero is still zero. 

The fee that is suddenly being disputed is the one you need to pay the rent. 

Two percent of your “clients” account for 98 percent of your billings in 10 percent of your time; 98 percent of your “clients” waste the other 90% of your time. The same ratio works if you substitute “client” with “candidate” or “consultant.” 

The earlier a consultant learns a deal is falling apart, the later management is likely to hear about it. 

The thicker the resume, the less faithful it is to the facts. 

The more notes a rookie consultant takes during training, the less likely they are to re­member what they wrote. 

The employer you’re desperate to reach will call you back when you’re in the bathroom. 

Your candidate will get a hefty raise and nice promotion the day you send out 100 of their re­sumes. 

Your worst consultant has the best excuses. 

The larger the Sunday ad you run, the greater the probability your receptionist will call in sick on Monday. 

The more important names a potential con­sultant mentions, the less likely any of them have ever heard of him. 

Placement management is not a democratic process. 

An unsuccessful recruiting assignment is al­ways someone else’s fault. 

Employers are never as smart as recruiters.

Uncategorized

LinkedIn – We Certainly Can’t Let The 3rd Party Agency Recruiters Get It.



fordyce-default

This is Great:

“Sneak-f***ed”. Brings back hazed memories, Dave. Many of them good.

To continue the theme of your post, have we all lost our b***s? “I’m sorry to hear John was in your files, Ms. Krank, but so are thousands of others, I’m sure. Your awareness of and interest in him was prompted by my firm’s referral, not the presence of an old resume in the vast wasteland of a database that you should have searcehd before you accepted any resume from any third party.”

“Ms. Krank, our business employs a simple, fair concept that covers just this situation. It’s called the ‘but-for’ rule. I’d be happy to acquaint you and, if necessary, your boss with. Otherwise, when would you like to talk to John?”

If you print the word, “Welcome”, on your forehead, what right do you have to be surprised when people wipe their shoes on your face?

Ted Moore in response to this

Related

Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

LinkedIn just reminded me of a term from my younger days!



fordyce-default

But since I am not Jane Fonda or Diane Keaton I will only write it as “sneak-f***ed” and let your imagination figure it out. I am applying this term to the news release this week about LinkedIn Recruiter