Welcome to The Fordyce Letter:

The Fordyce Letter

Straight Talk for the Recruiting Profession


Truth, Justice and the American Way of Headhunting

I’d love some comments on this situation…



fordyce-default

Here is what I understand the situation to be and a review of what I offered in case you need it for your records. I am sending it because it appears to me that Ken Tarmac is an excellent candidate and there could be a good fit with CodeBlowers if the right position is identified/designed.1) Time stamps mean nothing from a legal perspective when a candidate is introduced to a company by more than one entity. An exception might be when all parties agree to this in advance. Even then these exceptions are challenged in our industry regularly.2) This is because courts nearly always rule in favor of the entity that set up the interview with the client.3) For these reasons as well as the description below of what occurred, SearchPartner will indemnify CodeBlowers from any costs beyond the normal contracted fee if Ken Tarmac is hired. If this situation were not clear and correct we’d not offer this.I believe Ken will echo this understanding in the event you find it necessary to involve him.I received Ken’s information from a trading partner and screened him for availability and interest and verified that he had not heard of CodeBlowers previously. I forwarded him to you on Thursday 11/1 without copying Sue Staffing because we lost at least two qualified candidates for this position due to previous delays. You replied in an email that day that you’d review Friday and advise.You let me know Friday 11/2 that you and VP Ops would like to have a conference call at 3pm EST Monday 11/5 which was one of the available times for Ken to interview as relayed in the original introduction. Friday afternoon around 5pm EDT I reached Ken to confirm the time for the interview.Ken has told me that sometime between that time and now the representative from the other company called to set the call with PM. He says that he thought her involvement had something to do with the process already going on with CodeBlowers and SearchPartner. I asked Ken how she’d have gotten his resume and he said she may have gotten it from clearancejobs.com. Since we learned of him through work he did with my trading partner previously and since he had not heard of CodeBlowers until I spoke with him it did not matter to me and I did not ask if his resume was otherwise available.My guess is the other company likely sent Ken’s information to Sue Staffing before speaking with Ken (one of the dangers of publicly posting a resume) and then contacted Ken after Sue requested a call with Veto.I hope this will leave CodeBlowers to comfortably pursue Ken for a Sr. Sales position without worries of difficulty on the back end. Also, I again, highly recommend CEO to be involved in the process early on. I think Ken can be much more than a sales rep but I think he can do that as well.Ironically, this exact same situation happened with the same recruiter who set the appointment at a different client of mine 19 months ago. We offered that client the same solution and the candidate is happily employed there today.Please let me know if you need further information.Sincerely,Dave.

TFL archives

Internet Recruiting



fordyce-default

Electronic Recruiting 101
2007 Edition
By Shally Steckerl

I have been wanting to review this book for quite some time and am very pleased I was finally able to do so. Electronic Recruiting 101, by my friend and associate Shally Steckerl, chief cybersleuth of JobMachine, is to be considered the “bible” of all recruitment sourcing or researching books. There is so much information packed into this book, it is difficult for me to even know where to begin. This 228-page tome has everything and anything you ever wanted to know about the world of electronic recruiting.

Unlike most authors, who jump right into the technical aspects of electronic recruiting, Shally starts at the beginning, taking a proper requisition and then talking a bit about the hiring process itself. So many sourcers and researchers do not understand that every search starts with the requisition and goes from there. He talks about the talent landscape, the difference between prospects, candidates, and applicants, and recruitment scalability. He does a great job, as many authors before him have tried to do, in explaining the difference between passive and active candidates. Then he takes that a step further by offering much-needed ideas on how to make that initial approach.

Other topics he touches on include email issues, job postings, interviewing, candidate testing, applicant tracking systems, RPOs and BPOs, international recruiting, diversity recruiting, CRMs, relocation issues, how to hire sourcers, and recruiting metrics.

He has a great section on research fundamentals, a must-read section before you begin the research process. This covers finding top-level executives, résumé sourcing, search engine rules, using multiple search engines, building Boolean strings, and using search engines, and then offers many examples of strings he has personally used with success in his searches. He talks about meta-search engines, searching communities, weblogs, blogs, ISPs, newsgroups, social networks, and also using RSS feeds. He goes into the pros and cons of referral networking, talks about domain searching and link searching, and offers a number of international sourcing techniques. He also offers some information on using spiders and robots to make your life a little easier. Shally follows that up with a section on software and recruiting tools, computer tips, and research tips.

To tie it all together, his last section on references offers a terms glossary, an Internet history, guidelines on Net etiquette, reference tools, and a bit on working with other recruiters. He offers a list of Internet recruiting trainers for those who feel they need a bit more, then a number of industry-specific site listings and another list of industry-specific job sites.

This book should be “standard issue” for any researcher, sourcer, or recruiter’s desk. Published by none other than The Fordyce Letter, this book retails for $295 and can be ordered directly from the TFL website (www.fordyceletter.com).

HireDesk ATS
By Talent Technology

I am very pleased to be able to offer The Fordyce Letter readers this ATS review this month, as I discovered what a great option this could be for those seeking a powerful and very flexible solution. I had been hearing about HireDesk for a number of years and had been asked about it many times, so it was high time to take a closer look.

This product is geared toward small and medium-sized recruiting and staffing firms but has all the bells and whistles of the products the larger firms use and pay a lot of money for. It is a 100% Web-based system accessed easily by any Internet browser from any location, all for a very competitive pricing schedule.

The program opens up to a “recruiters dashboard” with a snapshot of all your activity – candidates, lists, jobs, clients, activities, and emails. Your home page is completely customizable, offering you the ability to pick and choose the features that are important to you. On the left side of the screen is a familiar Windows Explorer navigation tool that offers a “tree” view, allowing you to get to anywhere in the database from anywhere in the database. Very intuitive. Overall, one of the strong points I noticed was that they seem to have one of the most flexible/configurable interfaces in the business. You can not only configure the home page but also actually pick and choose the individual data fields you would like to see on each screen that you use.

Their product supports a number of recruiting revenue streams and workflows, including temp, perm, retained, client specific/recruiter specific. These workflows can drive metrics in different ways, depending on the metrics created for each specific workflow. Clients may have the need to post jobs to multiple “branded” websites. Talent portals are very easily integrated into your website – again, highly configurable.

They offer what is known as a Conceptual Search. In addition to the standard field (all data fields are searchable) and résumé searching, Conceptual Search allows you to automatically rank candidates against entire job orders, or compare against other résumés. The system will display the most relevant matches at the top of the list.

Their database is fully integrated with an included service that allows you to post your open job orders automatically to your website. Candidates then apply to a specific job, and those submissions are held for your approval before being permanently added to the database. Another feature I really like is Net Interviews – you can easily create custom, job-specific assessments that can be completed via an application process on your company website, sent via email, or via a recruiter interface on behalf of the candidate. Choose from a library, or create your own. Then you can rank candidates on the basis of results. The assessments are “branded” with your company logo and can be sent as part of a candidate profile to clients.

They are one of the very few ATS vendors I know that offer a completely customizable reporting function. This feature allows you to easily create custom reports on any information within the program. Reports have the ability to do drilldowns, sorting, calculations, statistics, charts, graphs, and much more.

As I mentioned before, their pricing seems very competitive. They offer a range of $65 to $99 per user per month based on features and setup. This is a range below that of many of their competitors offering similar features.

Anyone with an interest in more information on this great resource can visit the website at www.talenttech.com, or you can contact Alan Nappier, regional sales director, via email at anappier@talenttech.com or via voice at 1-866-747-3375.

WinTheView
Candidate Interview Preparation

I recently had a walk-through with what I think is a very interesting and innovative new service for the recruitment industry. WinTheView, a service developed by recruiters for recruiters, is a Web-enabled interview strategy by Digital Career Services. Basically, recruiters arrange for their candidates to go through an Internet-based interview preparation process that assures that candidates are able to communicate interest in the position, communicate to the client their fit for the job requirements and why they are the best candidate for the position, and have the opportunity to ask company, industry, position, and interview specific questions. Although this is a fairly new service, WinTheView has been available in an offline version and at least several hundred candidates have used it successfully, increasing the placement-to-send-out ratio dramatically.

The process results in a printed and bound document (pdf) that candidates take with them to the client interview. This document can also be presented to the client by the recruiter. I can see where this would differentiate candidates from other contenders by showing a high degree of interview preparation. It would also undoubtedly raise the confidence level of the candidates. From the client side, it shows candidate motivation and enthusiasm.

The WinTheView people say that hiring managers are very enthusiastic about the process and are complimentary of the candidates that show the enthusiasm, commitment, and motivation to prepare so thoroughly for an interview.

Recruiters can sign up for a monthly fee that allows an unlimited number of candidates to go through the process. For more information on this service, anyone with any interest can visit the WinTheView website at www.wintheview.com or contact Ken Diamond, founder of Wintheview.com, via email at kjdiamond@wintheview.com or via voice at (866) 941-0700.

Sourcers Guild

There is a fairly new group in town, the Sourcers Guild, dedicated to the art of names sourcing. At present they are a Yahoo group with a daily message containing posts from recruiters across the country asking questions about and offering answers to a wide array of issues relating to this topic. For those who don’t know, names sourcing is the activity of finding people with specific titles within specific organizations. This can be accomplished both via the Internet and by telephone.

Names sourcers who belong to this guild are highly professional and dedicated members of their industry. In this group you can learn how to conduct names sourcing and also locate someone to conduct a names sourcing project for you.

Members of the Sourcers Guild receive:

- discounts on training and educational materials
- cost savings in other group membership opportunities
- referrals from industry looking for names sourcers to perform projects
- access to posted sourcing assignments in the Database section of this site

If you’d like more information about becoming a member of this group, contact the Guild Guide, or moderator, Maureen Sharib, via email at Maureen@techtrak.com or via voice at (513) 899-9628.

Tip

I thought it might be appropriate to steal a tip from Shally’s book for this month’s tip. There are so many in there, I am hoping no one will mind my offering this one to the masses. In his section titled Results in Ten Minutes or Less, Shally offers many examples of search strings for different types of passive candidates. Here is one of his tips for sales recruiters:

contact sales.manager IKON 770

In the example above, he is looking for sales managers (the dot between sales and manager forces the search engine to look for that exact phrase) from the IKON office supply company. The 770 is to find people in the Chicago area. He also uses the contact keyword in the hope that the names he garners will have some way to contact the person on the page. To use this in your office, simply swap out the company and the area code and use other keywords that suit your needs.

Good luck!!

Mark E. Berger, CPC, AIRS CIR, has been in recruiting since 1979. He is currently a partner in Ramsey Fox, Inc., an IT services firm, and has been there and at its predecessor, M. E. Berger & Associates, since 1986. He has been heavily involved in Internet recruiting and is an expert on recruiting and sourcing products, services available on the Internet, and how these products add to the bottom line. Mark’s interests include successfully integrating both computer and Internet recruiting technology into a traditional recruiting environment. He has taken AIRS I and II training and has obtained the AIRS CIR designation. Mark is also on the board of directors for the Missouri Association of Personnel Services. He can be reached at mark@ramseyfox.com. His website is www.swatrecruiting.com, and we recommend that you visit it to see archives of his articles and information offerings exclusively for recruiters.

TFL archives

Time Management and Planning for Recruiters



fordyce-default

“If one cannot increase the supply of a resource, one must increase its yield.”

- Peter Drucker

What makes a recruiter successful in our business? Solid training leading to an outstanding skill level? Certainly! Yet what allows those skills to get results? Effectiveness. Time management. Planning. To think otherwise is to deny reality and the personal observations of any experienced person in our industry.

What is time management? Well, let’s talk about what it is not. Time management is not reducing the time of your individual business calls. To the contrary, most people’s calls are entirely too shallow and the length of the calls needs to be increased. Rather, a decent working definition of “time management” would be “spending the appropriate amount of time in the appropriate place.”

To some degree, everything done properly in our business is time management. Nevertheless, there are a number of areas where time management more directly applies. Let’s discuss them one at a time.

A) Select Search Assignments Correctly

In a good market, you’ll get lots of search assignments. But the more you get, the more you have to choose from. And the more likely it is that you’ll select the wrong one. It’s too easy to get distracted and do a shallow selection job, especially with an existing client!

Working on the wrong search assignment costs you more than the time and money wasted. It costs you the new searches you could have had if you had been concentrating on finding more, instead of trying to fill a bad one. Moreover, filling a mediocre search assignment is tough in any market.

There are three different classifications of searches, and the classification tells you how much time to invest. They are:

Class A – Worth conducting a full-scale recruiting effort
Class B – Worth doing a file search only
Class Q – Source company – not worth working at all

To a great degree, being able to separate the three types is what will determine much of your success. What specifically are the criteria for a Class A search assignment? There’s no point in repeating information here you can get elsewhere. You’ll find this in Volumes I and II of “The Art of Recruiting” video/DVD series by this author. The tendency will be to relax your standards in this area. Don’t give in to this expensive mistake.

B) Improve Selection of Face-to-Face Interviews of Candidates in Your Office

If you work a local market or if you run ads for candidates, either in the newspapers or on job boards, you’ll be besieged by people calling you wanting to meet with you personally. If you agree to meet with more than a small percentage of these people, you will be throwing away massive amounts of time and money. If you interview people in your office as a routine practice, ask yourself this question: What percentage of the people your firm brings into the office ever get sent out on an interview?

Many firms, of course, never interview a candidate face-to-face, or even work a local market. If you do, have your secretary pull 50 candidates at random that you’ve interviewed in your office and answer the above question for you. Unless at least one-third of the potential candidates you meet in your office get sent out, you’re wasting lots of time interviewing unplaceable people.

Screen much more tightly; there’s no reason to interview people personally unless you have something for them right now. Have them send you a résumé. Should something come along, you can always call them and bring them in when you need to. But don’t let everyone who calls waste your time with a face-to-face interview. There’s just no point to it. And consider learning to recruit effectively. You can do much better than running ads in newspapers or on job boards.

C) Spend More Time Planning

There really is no question about it. Time spent in planning is time well invested. An hour of “planning” and seven hours of “doing” will yield much better results than eight hours of seat-of-the-pants frenetic activity. Yet do you plan correctly? Or enough?

The problem is that in a strong market, there is an equally strong tendency to drift away from the habits that will maximize your income, such as correct planning. You’d better get back to those habits – or learn them to start with – if you want to survive in a weak market or maximize your production in a good one.

Planning as it relates to a desk – not necessarily running the firm – is of two types. Long term and short term. Long-term planning, as it’s used here, is anything other than daily planning. This means annual, quarterly, monthly, and weekly. Short-term in our business means daily planning.

A concise recruiter’s version of desk-oriented long-term planning is contained in the new book for experienced recruiters entitled Breakthrough!, Chapter 18, “Managing the Process.”

As it relates to daily planning, let’s restate the obvious first. Daily planning should be done at the end of the day, not the next morning. That’s standard industry knowledge. That certainly doesn’t make a concept automatically correct. In this instance, however, it is.

Secondly, you should think about what makes a good daily planner. To be effective on an ongoing basis, a daily planner must dominate your day. The best way of making sure it does that is for it to dominate your desk – all the time. This means it should be big. Blotter size (on a pad) is ideal. A jazzy little spiral-bound notebook looks nice, but it’s awkward to use. In fact, it’s rarely used, because it’s so comfortable to keep it closed and so uncomfortable to keep it open. This is not what you want. A blotter-sized pad may not look as stylish, but you’ll use it.

A correct daily planner should prioritize your activities, shape your day, not just fill it up with “things to do.” Regardless of what kind of daily planner you use, it’s the order of things that will make it effective. There should be numbers on your planner also (1, 2, 3, 4) to remind you of this.

It cannot be mentioned too strongly that you must fill out your daily planner. This means writing out the names of candidates or firms you will call the next day to achieve your goals. Simply having a stack of cards or a computer printout/screen is inadequate. Writing things out in your own handwriting the night before engenders commitment to do what you wrote out! It also means that you cannot hide from yourself throughout the next day! The end of the next day should see you with a fully filled-out planner with lines drawn through the calls you have planned and made! If this is the case, you will go home with a solid feeling of satisfaction, even if those calls have not yielded the hoped-for results. At least you will know you are doing the things you should be doing to achieve success.

There is a great psychological benefit to writing things out. Stacks of cards or computer printouts or screens afford no such benefits. That’s why trying to use a computer screen as a planner doesn’t work well, any more than stacking cards on your desk would.

Planning, both long term and short term, isn’t really something that takes time. It’s a process that allows you to utilize the time you do have available with the best possible results. Correct planning will enable you to do so.

The specifics of how to fill out a daily planner, and the correct order, and what should be there can be obtained in the aforementioned new hardbound book Breakthrough! or, from a different perspective, the excellent foundational book Search and Placement!, by Larry Nobles (www.larrynobles.com).

D) Color-Code All Forms

Take a look at your desk at the end of a day. Pretty messy, huh? Now look at the colors of the papers on your desk. If you’ve got a preponderance of white papers there, you’ll find that color-coding will help you to organize your desk with no extra time, cost, or effort.

What colors are your standardized forms? All white? No good. Change the colors. You’ll not only render each form immediately identifiable, but you’ll organize your desk a lot more easily as well.

Do you have a formal search assignment form? So do I. It’s yellow in color. Do you have a standardized recruit form? Mine is blue. How about a reference check form? I use a peach color. Or how about – but you get the idea.

Forms should be standardized. They should also be on pads, and each should be its own distinct color. The actual color you use doesn’t matter, of course, as long as it isn’t so dark as to obscure the handwriting on it. Pick your favorites. Colored paper doesn’t cost any more than white paper, and its use will enable you to organize your desk a lot more quickly and easily. If this seems minor, look at your desk at the end of a hard day, and you may re-evaluate the significance of a neat workplace. Anything that takes away from optimum effectiveness needs to be corrected. Desk organization is a complex and important topic. Color-coding your forms will help a lot.

E) Study Time Management

Surprisingly, one of the negatives of a strong market is that you will not be forced to improve your habit patterns and methods of working a desk. As Samuel Johnson once said, “Depend upon it, sir. When a man knows he is to be hanged in a fortnight, it concentrates his mind wonderfully!” Recruiters who start in slow markets are forced to develop good habits to survive; those who start in a strong one will frequently lack good habits of planning. Which one are you? Better skills in this area will help you enormously in any market.

Industry-specific books will contain much on this subject. But you should also read books on time management and planning. How long since you’ve read a book on those subjects?

Following are three books you should buy and read, underline and implement:

Working Smart, by Michael LeBoeuf
How to Get Control of Your Time and Life, by Alan Lakein
The Effective Executive, by Peter Drucker

It is important to recognize that there is a great benefit in addition to the valuable knowledge you’ll gain from these books. Simply reading (and thereby focusing) on the subject will bring you to a greater awareness of its critical importance. The greater your awareness, the more attention you will pay to the management of your time throughout the day.

F) Eliminate Personal Calls, Conversations, or Activities During Business Hours

You can see it in every office, including one-person operations. Some people put in their time. Others are there to accomplish, to achieve, to improve, to produce, to win. The difference, to be blunt, is a matter of discipline.

Personal telephone calls, incoming or outgoing, are simply an example of this lack of focus. In no way is it suggested that such calls have to do with illicit activities. To the contrary, most such calls have to do with perfectly normal and even praiseworthy involvements – hobbies, friends, family, organizations. The problem with such calls during business hours is twofold. One is the amount of time they take. Left unchecked, such calls will grow to excess. The greater cost, however, is not the actual minutes (or hours) such calls steal from production. Rather, the greater cost is the degree to which these calls reduce the overall intensity of your business day.

This concept is best explained in an outstanding book by Peter Drucker entitled The Effective Executive. Drucker, in case you’re not aware of it, was a management consultant so impactful that the best book about him, by John Tarrant, is entitled Drucker: The Man Who Invented the Corporate Society.

The point made in The Effective Executive is that accomplishment is best achieved through blocks of uninterrupted time. Every activity has three phases: the start-up, the doing, and the wind-down. The start-up and wind-down periods are essentially constant, regardless of the time spent doing them. Thus, a one-hour time block and a 15-minute period have close to the same time allotted to starting and ending. The “doing” time, however, is very different. One hour of uninterrupted time, according to Drucker, is worth not 4 but 10 times that of four 15-minute segments – because the “doing” time has increased by that much. It is not solely the time you spend on an activity that allows you to achieve; rather, it is the amount of concentrated intense “doing” time that yields accomplishment.

Allowing a constant or even occasional stream of non-business calls during business hours does more than take time; it forces an equally constant stream of new start-up and wind-down periods, and thus greatly reduces what you actually achieve.

The same principle is true regarding conversations within the office. Some people work with intensity for an entire day. Others wander around the office bothering others with silly business questions or discussions of evening activities, sports, or politics throughout the day. Which one do you think accomplishes the most? Which one are you?

If you’re forced to admit that you identify more with the latter person than the former, then you’d better make some changes. It takes skills to do well in our business. But it takes focus and intensity, too. Lack of either will cause you to fail.

How to Reduce These Time-Wasters

Here’s how you eliminate the incoming personal calls that cost so very much. Tape a small card to your phone with the following heading in red: “Personal calls steal time and intensity.” Underneath, put this question and this phrase:

1) Is this an emergency?

2) “You’ve caught me right in the middle of an important business meeting. I do want to speak with you. May I get back to you this evening?”

Clearly, there are a very, very few calls that really do require some sort of immediate action on your part. First, determine if the call is a genuine crisis. If it isn’t, just say the words listed above in #2. Rarely will anyone continue talking after you say these words. Used whenever a non-business call comes in, this little two-step process will very quickly cause such calls to stop reducing your time and intensity during business hours.

Forget “multi-tasking.” It takes concentration to accomplish things. There is no reason you cannot set up a special ring on your cell phone for critical calls if you must. But the best choice may be to turn it off! Your secretary will tell you if an isolated call is critical if you tell her up-front.

The same small card, altered slightly, will also help you to end the continuous stream of chatterboxes and time-wasters who afflict so many offices. This is a particular problem where the manager has made the mistake of having an office layout consisting of private offices. Still, any multi-person firm can suffer from this problem. That doesn’t mean you have to, however. If you’ve been allowing these convivial time-wasters to reduce your intensity and production, you’ll have to take steps to re-train them. Here’s how:

Just alter the words on the small card on your phone a bit. Have it read: “Personal Calls/Conversations Steal Time and Intensity.” Then add under the 2 (see above):

a. “I’d be happy to talk with you about that after work, but right now I’ve got an important assignment that I’ve just got to get filled!”

b. Pick up the phone and make a call!

G) Get Nonessential Reading Material Out of Your Office

How much reading do you do in your office? If your answer is “not any; I do all my reading at home,” you’re doing it right. But if you reply, “Well, there’s the Wall Street Journal, and industry publications in my niche, and my regular newspaper, and . . . ,” you may be spending a lot of time reading when you should be on the phone! Many people use reading in the office as an excuse for not staying on the phone. Make sure it isn’t you. Reading is important. But do it at home.

H) The High-Tech Time Waster

Thomas Edison had a sign behind his desk for many years to which we should all pay attention. It said, “Some people will go to any lengths to avoid having to think.”

If you’ll substitute “pick up the phone” for “think,” you’ll have identified a great deal of the real appeal of the Internet. Mediocre recruiters or new people love the Internet. Why? Because it is a lot easier than working for a living!

The truth is that it’s a lot of fun to be hopping around in cyberspace, clicking your mouse, pointing it here and there, watching the computer bring up neat images like magic. Almost like a video game. It isn’t so much fun to be out there selling sometimes, asking real people for names of good candidates, recruiting, making marketing calls, sometimes being turned down, people not returning your calls. People who lack either skills or discipline will indeed go to any lengths to avoid rejection and frustration.

Once upon a time, the Internet as a means of identifying potential candidates may have had some merit. That, of course, was before Net growth slowed dramatically, before unemployed candidates started flooding the for-free and for-fee job sites, and before Internet “trainers” realized that your corporate clients would pay better than you, and started focusing on helping your clients avoid paying your fees. As Mike Kappel, president of Top Echelon Network, has written, “The Internet honeymoon is over. The Internet is now known to yield second-rate candidates. Fire up that telephone.” So true. Or as Mutual Funds Magazine has said, “Live by the tech; die by the Tech!”

The problem is that this once-trendy but now-dated concept of Internet hustling for candidates has left us with a major handicap in achieving our financial goals – that distracting mechanical box on your desk. Even if you have avoided getting involved in playing actual computer games, there is a real probability that you have not escaped other addictions relative to the Internet.

A recent Robert Half International survey found that 60% of executives said that time spent accessing the Web for non-business purposes was undermining their employees’ effectiveness on the job. Consider the following:

- 70% of all stock trading occurs from 9 to 5.

- A Nielsen survey found that the majority of online shopping, auctions, and news reading takes place during working hours.

- 70% of all Internet porn traffic takes place during business hours – but I know this isn’t you.

- A recent Men’s Health magazine survey of 2,000 employed subscribers asked the following question: “What distracts you from your work?” The most frequent answer (74%): The Internet.

It is noteworthy that the recruiter message boards that infest our industry have seen a drastic reduction in messages and traffic; apparently those who once had the time to peruse and add to the chat boards are out of business or have decided to pay attention to business. Why do you think that is the case?

So what’s the answer to this modern high-tech time waster? Easy; get the heck off it!

First, change your computer so it does not automatically hook up to the Internet. Then, don’t access it until 5 p.m. This does not mean you should not utilize your database of candidates if you are computerized; it means stay off the Internet. Shut down your email. Turn off your instant messaging. Deal with it post-prime business time. What do you think would happen without the distraction of the Internet during working hours? Chances are, with all that extra time and reduced distraction on your hands, you’d pick up the phone and make phone calls. And more money. Maybe you should try it and see.

Is This Important?

Make no mistake; this is a sales business and it is a skills business! Being terrific in these areas, however, while having major weaknesses in time management and planning, just doesn’t make sense. A small amount of effort here will yield major dividends with no extra time spent in the office. That’s a pretty good trade-off for the minimal investment of time spent to develop the proper habits.

A 30-year veteran and best-selling author in our industry, Steve Finkel has been referred to by Recruitment International, Europe’s largest industry publication, as “the world’s premier trainer in search and recruitment.” The producer of many excellent training products, he has conducted in-house training programs for over 400 firms on five continents, with 85% repeat business. His new totally up-to-date 360-page book Breakthrough! is considered to be the definitive work for experienced recruiters. For complete information visit his website at www.stevefinkel.com or call (314) 991-3177.

TFL archives

Job Staging



fordyce-default

Tips to share with your clients
Get Your “Houses” in Order!

The best companies are having trouble attracting employees. Not only are companies in different industries vying for the same candidates as the current crop of college grads embraces career experimentation, but these candidates themselves present different challenges from only a couple of years ago. The 80 million strong Millennials (also known as Generation Y/Echo Boom) are acutely discerning job-seekers who understand the value of their unique tech-savvy skills and the power of their networking achievements. Demanding, and receiving, more competitive pay and benefits, faster advancement, and more responsibility, this entry-level generation alone presents a vastly different set of challenges than any before.

Multiple job offers frequently greet new graduates, which contributes to today’s drive in pay. Civil engineering and accounting graduates alone are nearing $50,000 in beginning pay, and one sector, chemical engineering, has cracked the $60,000 notch while other engineering disciplines (electrical, mechanical) hover already in the mid-$50,000s, beating out recent economics majors, who are being offered $51,600.

Word to the Wise: Ratchet up what you’re willing to pay to market expectations. Get real and get down to business.

The reason my telephone names sourcing job exists in this world is that companies are having so much trouble finding candidates. The entry-level candidates that are entering the workforce today are the same ones I’m going to be sourcing after tomorrow on your behalf. In order to attract them in the future, you need to understand how to attract them today. What are you doing to attract employees? Have you thought about it?

One solution comes out of the real estate practice of “home-staging,” in which a home is “set up” to present its best face forward to potential buyers. In the Recruitosphere, this can be called “job-staging.”

Job-staging techniques can be tailored to fit any company’s budget. The first thing to do is to glam up your curb appeal. Whether it’s an attractive and well-tuned website that moves with intuitive alacrity to the viewer’s (job seeker) command or fresh carpeting in your office reception area, curb appeal is paramount in getting job seekers through your front door.

Make your entrance memorable. The second a potential job seeker lands on the front page of your website or reaches for the polished and gleaming front door to your office, he or she should be thinking “looks good, sounds good, feels good, smells good.” Keep it clean and keep it updated with fresh material and information.

Take a look at your job descriptions. Are they the same old, same old “Requires this, requires that, don’t bother applying unless . . .”? Move over and get with the program! Today’s job seekers are willing to experiment, and they expect you to be willing to “experiment” with them. Open your minds (and close down some of your “requirements”) in order to attract them. Some of them just don’t make sense. Lose the stinkin’ thinkin’ and embrace the sea of change.

Sand, steam, pressure clean, and replace what is obviously no longer working. You can do better.

“Job seeker first.” Learn to think like this and get out of their way. Make yourself unobtrusive, and make whatever “furniture” you have lying around that could get in their way unobtrusive, too. Remove the barriers to entry. Clear the decks. Streamline. Less is more.

Modernize everything. Today’s job seeker is tech-savvy like no candidate you have ever seen before. Offer (and allow) her the gadgetry – she needs much of it like she needs the air (I hope it smells good) she breathes in your office. Think TECh: Technology Ever Changing. Keep up with it.

Project a world-class image everywhere. Look at your offices as if they were a five-star hotel. Small things add up. Flowers on the reception desk, pleasing and welcoming “greeters,” fast elevators, shining clean bathrooms, convenient and socially attractive cafeterias that serve good and modern food, break rooms that offer solace and quiet, private cubicles that approach the coddled feeling that so many of this entry generation grew up with – think what’s going on inside their heads. Cater to them. Read up on the Servant Leadership mantra.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Servant_leadership

Don’t forget what your sites “sound” like. Remember, this generation grew up on technology, and they expect to be surrounded with sights, sounds, and smells that inform and appease, flat screens that stream the day’s news, and hallway music that soothes their savaged senses. That’s what they’re talkin’ about – learn to listen to the language they’re speaking.

I promise you, you will get your money back (this is all tax deductible, anyway) in the sale of your job if you “stage” it correctly. You’ll add square footage to the “opportunity” you’re presenting if you approach this dynamic, emotively thinking generation in a way that’s sure to elicit that “Wow!” response you’re looking for. Watch and see if it doesn’t work wonders on your more seasoned candidates as well!

Maureen Sharib (maureen at techtrak.com) is a telephone names sourcer, names sourcing since 1997. She and her husband, Bob, own the names-sourcing firm TechTrak.com, Inc. (www.techtrak.com), which helps companies fill their hard-to-place positions at a fraction of the cost of traditional recruiting venues. Maureen is the 2007-2008 Guild Guide for the newly formed Sourcers Guild, a professional organization for sourcers (http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/sourcersguild/). She is also the author of the one-of-a-kind and very popular “Magic in the Method” telephone names sourcing training course and a frequent contributor to many online recruiting-related sites. Maureen holds a bachelor of arts in economics from the University of Cincinnati and lives in Morrow, Ohio.

TFL archives

Good Questions to Ask Yourself



fordyce-default

I’m writing to you on the plane returning from the Pinnacle Society meeting in New Orleans, which was generously sponsored by Sendouts.com and your friends at The Fordyce Letter.

While there I had a very interesting conversation with executive search veteran Ralph Prostik, senior partner and founder of Boston Search Group. Ralph was MRI’s National Rookie of the Year in 1994, a Top 20 biller nationally in 1994, 1995, and 1996, and MR Boston Account Executive of the Year in 1995 and 1996.

He asked me:

- Do you feel you are good at what you do?
- Do you feel you are worth the fees that you charge?
- Do you feel you are among the best in the business, that the client is extremely well served in working with you? And that in working with you, they are actually working with one of the best recruiters in the business?
- Do you feel that your candidates benefit from a relationship with you?
- Do you get thank-you notes?
- Does it matter?

Worth thinking about, aren’t they?

There were a few other good questions, but I didn’t have a pen handy. Earl Nightingale said you should always have a pen handy. He said, “Ideas are like slippery fish; they need to be speared with the point of a pen when they surface, lest they slip back into the vast recesses of our mind, perhaps never to show their heads again.”

Let’s take a closer look at Ralph’s questions. Grab a pen in case any keepers swim to the surface while you read this.

———————————

Do you feel you are good at what you do?

I saw where someone had quoted me from a recent speaking engagement as saying: “80% of people THINK they are in the top 20%” ~ Joe Pelayo.

What I actually said, or meant to say, was “80 percent of people SAY they are in the top 20%.” While people will SAY that, it’s my belief that most people, me and you included, are actually fearful and that they woefully overestimate their competitors in their own minds.

We all have a tendency to overestimate the competition. I’ll tell you how I discovered this. One day during the dot-com bust, I grew tired of hearing my team talk about how tough it was out there and how strong the competition was. I listed the names of our competitors on the whiteboard in the conference room. Then I asked my team to estimate the team-size of each of our competitors and we wrote down the number. Then I called the competition and found out exactly how many recruiters they really had. What we discovered was that we had been overestimating the competition in our minds by over 40%!

The more you meet your competition, the stronger you will feel about your position in the market. Please understand – I’m not knocking your competition. What I am knocking is the imagination inside all of us that tends to overestimate our opposition! If you are human, it is likely you are overestimating your competition. Stop giving them so much credit, and give yourself more. Go to meetings where you can meet the competition, or schedule periodic coffees with them.

Do you feel you are worth the fees that you charge?

I remember one time when I was first starting out in the business, and Frank, a top producer in the office, told me something I’ll never forget. He said, “Always remember, Joe, your client company’s energy bill is not the same as your energy bill. Your fee might be $10,000 or even $100,000, and that might seem like an awful lot of money to you. But to a $10 million dollar or a $100 million dollar company, it’s a lot less.

Think about the value your recruit will bring to the company and the corporate cost if they cannot attract the talent you will help them lure in. Let’s take Google, for example. Including stock, the fee paid to Heidrick & Struggles for recruiting Eric Schmidt, the CEO at Google, was estimated at $128 million. As much money as that is, you’d have to be an idiot to say they didn’t get their money’s worth. What if they hadn’t been able to attract anyone who could generate Wall Street confidence at that precise moment in time? We’d all still be singing Yeaaaaahooooooooooooooooo!

Google got more than they paid for, and the fact is that most of the time when you place someone, your client gets more than they pay for, believe me. You just have to see it through your client’s eyes and not yours.

Do you feel you are among the best in the business, that the client is extremely well served in working with you? And that in working with you they are actually working with one of the best recruiters in the business?

The market deserves our passionate resolve to unleash the imprisoned splendor within us, leaving behind the past and striving forward to the mark to be the great recruiter now building within you. The fact that you are reading this article and subscribing to this newsletter shows you have a commitment to be among the best in the business. Take a moment now of quiet reflection with a pen and paper and jot down three actions you can take today that will make you a better recruiter. I’ll help you out with the first one: #1 Invest in 21 Ways to Increase Your Billings training program for recruiters, from Joe Pelayo at www.jpspeaking.com.

Do you feel your candidates benefit from a relationship with you?

I think any candidate who talks to you is extremely fortunate to have the rare opportunity to hear a few of your sage words. Listen, if you’ve been in the business 30 days, you have a better handle on opportunities than they have. And if you have been in the business 20 or 30 years, you can offer them priceless advice and wisdom that few others can.

Do you get thank-you notes?

Yes, and keep them. I’ve got mine dating back to 1986. Some days, you’ll need them. Les Brown says, “In the good times you put it in your pocket; in the tough times, you’ll put it in your heart!”

Does it matter?

Yes. It matters. You will influence more lives, careers, and companies than in almost any other field. You’re a headhunter.

Man, I love being a headhunter! Thanks, Ralph.

Joe Pelayo is a true self-made man. He began in the recruiting business in 1986 at the ripe old age of 17, when he says he “found every way to fail in the recruiting business.” After finally finding success with two recruiting firms, he started his own in 1990. As CEO of Joseph Michaels, Inc., Joe works an active desk recruiting CFOs and related financial and accounting executives. He is a longtime member of the Pinnacle Society, an organization consisting of 75 of the top recruiters in the United States.

Joe is also author of the new book “Work Your Network!” which has received excellent reviews from Les Brown, Brian Tracy, and industry leaders, speakers, and trainers including Terry Petra, Bill Radin, Paul Hawkinson, and others. He writes a monthly free newsletter called “The Network,” sent to 50,000 recruiters and executives, and is the author of several motivational DVD training programs, including the brand-new training system for recruiters: 21 Ways to Increase Your Billings!

Joe is available for speaking and training recruiters worldwide. His website is www.jpspeaking.com.

TFL archives

Candidate Control Revisited



fordyce-default

Many articles in TFL address the common problems we have in this business. Such recent articles as “Reference Check Boomerangs,” “Gotcha!” and others I find very informational and useful, but rarely do I see the real solution to almost all of these problems: candidate control.

Today, there is this prevailing notion that candidate control is a “myth.” That’s a real shame because there is only one real “trump card” we have to almost all employer-caused problems: the strength of the relationship we have with our candidates. I learned back in the early 1980s that no matter how much a company enjoys doing business with you, or how strong a “client” relationship we have with a company, today’s “4.0 client” is tomorrow’s fee avoider.

Now, with technology as it is today, information is available on anyone at any time, so candidate control is more important than ever, and that goes for both applicants as well as passive recruits. All the problems with “we found him in our database” or “we know that guy already” or “our HR guy was already onto him” or “hey, that guy’s available?” (reference check boomerangs) or “I’m the new HR sheriff in town and your fee is now 20%” or “there’s no signed contract, and we are a state where you need one to get paid” means zero if you inoculate yourself against these problems and do the most important thing of all in this business: CONTROL YOUR CANDIDATES!

Call me a dinosaur, but where I come from, candidate control is a cornerstone of our business. Today, the vogue thing in our industry is for trainers to teach that candidate control is a “myth” because “human beings cannot be controlled – they are going to do what’s in their best interest, not yours.” The second half of that statement is true; the first half is absolutely false. A human being in our business can (must?) be controlled; you just need to know how to do it!

I don’t care whether or not a company knows about my candidate (in fact, I assume they already know about him). I don’t worry about whether or not I have a signed agreement. I don’t fret over how much the company says it will pay after the fact. My bottom line is my relationship with my candidates.

Before I work with anyone, they must agree to do exactly as I say, when I say it, or I am not presenting them to any company, anywhere. Of course, I state such in a much more diplomatic way, especially with recruits, but any candidate I work with had better follow my instructions the same way he follows his attorney’s or doctor’s or he can find some other headhunter and waste his time. Here’s my rule: “From this hour forward, any interview you go on with any company must be arranged through me as your representative. I am your agent, just as if you were a sports star or actor and I am your representative. Nothing related to your job hunt (job change) occurs without my involvement. I don’t care if your uncle calls you with a dream job – you need to give him my phone number and tell him I am your agent.”

With that commitment, I have fended off one problem after another. In the past six months alone, I sent a $100K manager to an interview and afterwards, the company’s HR executive called me saying that people within their company already knew my candidate, “and also knew he was looking, so we are not going to pay your 30K fee.”

I calmly informed the HR executive that perhaps with other recruiters he was correct, but not with me. I told him to call the candidate and ask him who is “representing” him to the company. This HR person was expecting the usual “throw the recruiter under the bus” candidate amnesia, but when he called my candidate, my candidate did what he had agreed to do in my first meeting with him: he informed this HR manager that “Neil is my recruiter, and if you hire me, you will need to pay him.” This HR manager was flabbergasted to see a candidate who was actually loyal. That’s because most recruiters lack that level of candidate control. Some recruiters would say I was just “lucky” to have ethical candidates. I see it more as my candidates are afraid of me!

Why is candidate control considered a “myth”? I believe it’s because most recruiters don’t see themselves as an equal professional with an attorney or physician. Rarely do people give their lawyer or physician a hard time, or disobey his/her advice. That’s mostly because they see their doctor or lawyer as being so professional they are afraid of upsetting him/her! You need to gain that kind of respect (and obedience) from your candidates. The way to do it is to BE as professional as a lawyer or doctor.

Neil McNulty is president of McNulty Management Group, a recruiting and placement firm that licenses placement firms to use the “30/30 Placement Programâ„¢” for placing transitioning military personnel within 30 miles of any point on the map in the USA, and doing so within just 30 days. He can be reached at neil@mcnultymanagement.com.

TFL archives

Human Capital Selling



fordyce-default

My insights this month will be very brief due to the long “top producer tip from the trenches,” which centers on the application of sales principles to recruiting. I chose this topic because I have noticed a troubling trend while attending several conferences and meetings recently. The trend is that many practitioners are starting to believe that the bigger the vocabulary, the more that recruiters are management consultants and not search/sales consultants. Strategic alignment, globalization, employee engagement, and workforce demographics are impacting the conventional paradigms inculcated in the human capital market. These words are some of the industry’s “consultant speak” to add to the themes of outsourcing, core competencies, and top grading!

At the end of the day, though, companies hire us to IDENTIFY, ATTRACT, EVALUATE, AND SECURE THE VERY BEST TALENT FOR THEIR MOST URGENT AND CRITICAL NEEDS. Bain, McKinsey, and Mercer, to name but a few, are all well-respected management consulting firms that do not do recruiting, so why do we feel the need at times to sound like them? OUR JOB IS TO SELL, AND WE SHOULD NEVER APOLOGIZE FOR THAT!

If we believe that a position represents a significant career enhancement for someone, then WHY NOT SELL THEM ON CONSIDERING IT? If we believe that a candidate presents a solution to a client’s current staffing challenge, then WHY NOT SELL THEM ON HIRING THAT PERSON?

Consultative SALES is persuading someone to do something that is GOOD FOR THEM. Just as doctors are occasionally guilty of medical malpractice, recruiters are occasionally guilty of sales malpractice. So, the next time you decide to refer to yourself as a “human capital talent acquisition strategist,” just don’t forget to SELL!!!

This month’s top producer tip from the trenches was co-created by Mark Whalls and Stephen Norred, who are co-directors of Kaye/Bassman’s Military Specialty Practice. The Military Specialty Practice complements and supplements all industry sectors by providing the best and the brightest candidates from our nation’s armed forces. Mark and Stephen achieved a first-year (2005) company record in both placements and revenue. They have over 16 years of combined experience in military search and four decades of active duty for the United States Navy. In 2007, they are attempting to break the $2 million mark in search-fee revenue, which is a feat accomplished only once before in Kaye/Bassman history.

Sales Mechanics 101

To be a top biller requires more than hard work and luck. Many people in our industry love saying that what we do is not rocket science, but believe me when I tell you there is a science and a method to all we do in sales. This starts with a fundamental understanding of both the science and the art of persuasive communication. Understanding the flow and purpose of the conversation is the only way to get to the fifth step, the only one that matters – the close. Just as an athlete needs to warm up and stretch before performing, the first four steps serve as a warm-up to the close. Always remember that the trial close can be used at any step of the sale when your client is sending buying signals.

Conversation

Before anyone wants to listen to what’s important to you (your agenda), they want to see what’s in it for them or how you’re going to help them (their needs). Before someone is going to talk to you about what is important to them, you want to have permission to collect their information. This is best accomplished in the opening, by proposing or stating an agenda that lets your client give you the information you need while not making them feel too committed too early. For example, “What I’d like to do today, with your permission, is to find out the three most important things to you when deciding to partner with a search firm.”

You should always ask open-ended questions. For example, “What profiles do you have the most difficulty filling and what do you attribute that to?” as opposed to “Do you have any needs?” At this point, it’s time to close your mouth and open your ears to listen for the language of needs. Before you move out of the conversation, you should feel that you have established rapport with your client/candidate. You should feel comfortable and that you’re talking on the same level and that there is a mutual buy-in. Your client or candidate should be saying, “Tell me more.”

Curiosity

Curiosity is the bridge to “tell me more.” After listening to your client’s/candidate’s needs, you should preface a basic understanding of what you heard in the first step of the sale. For example, “You said earlier that the three things most important to you in choosing a partner in search were depth of experience, the ability to deliver both quality and quantity in a timely manner, and being flexible enough to work with them as timelines, needs, and fits may change within the course of the relationship.” To demonstrate this understanding is the purpose of the curiosity step of the sale. For example, “I clearly understand your need to have (quote exactly their need) depth of experience, the ability to deliver both quality and quantity in a timely manner, and being flexible enough to work with them as timelines, needs, and fits may change within the course of the relationship. We here at (your firm) are industry experts at delivering quantity while not sacrificing quality and meeting your onboard commitments and timelines and maintaining a high degree of flexibility based on your understanding of your market space.” This is just a verbal confirmation to your client that you hear and understand their needs and will help them solve their problem.

Conviction

Conviction should always be delivered in a consultative and relevant need-support module, meaning that no one is looking to partner with a used car salesman on a $400,000 deal. If you ever listen to a salesman who sells Ferraris, you will not hear the same presentation you will get from a salesman selling Fords. Conviction is about clearly and professionally explaining to your client how your services are going to support their exact needs. For example, “You said you wanted quantity without sacrificing quality. Our firm specializes in (insert your practice here) and has complete market mastery within your space. All we do here five days a week, 52 weeks a year, is screen, source, and place the exact candidates you are looking to find. Our database is composed of candidates with the skills and background needed to impact your bottom line (the benefit to the client), giving us the ability to respond quickly to any search while remaining flexible due to our understanding of your market space.”

Desire

Desire is a powerful tool that paints a picture of your prospect enjoying the benefits of your services and can only really be used if while in the “Mr. Big Ears” mode, we were able to uncover the “why?” behind the “want.” For example, “You said earlier, if you could fill these three vacant positions that have been open for the last four months, you believe your boss has given you this final test before offering you the new VP position in HR-Global Staffing. This may sound something like this. For example, “Mr. Client, it has now been three months since we partnered in this search and you have filled all three positions and the feedback from the top is ‘you nailed it.’ Your department head has informed you that the CEO is sending the corporate jet down from Chicago to talk about your new position as the VP-Global Staffing. You sit back in the leather seat, you look out the extra-large Gulfstream porthole window, you hear the engines roar up, you see the runway begin to race by you, you feel yourself shifting back in your seat as you begin to climb to 34,000 feet, you level off, and the flight attendant (the only one) brings you a champagne flute and says, ‘Congratulations, Mr. Client, you must be very excited.’ ”

This is a tool designed to put your client in the future enjoying the benefits of your services, by painting a picture that appeals to the senses. This one of course may be outlandish, but a little levity and humor never hurt either!

Trial Close/Close

The secret to closing is knowing WHEN to close, not how. When can you close? Anytime! Remember, a trial close can be used anytime you are hearing the language of needs. Overselling can be hazardous once you hear what your client needs. For example, “All I want is a mechanical engineer, 2007 graduate from a good school with a 3.0 GPA who can start in January. I’m willing to pay 35%.” Trial close, “I will get you a fee agreement today for the one position for a mechanical engineer at 35% (trial close). Can you get that signed and faxed back to me today so that I can initiate the search?” This is an example of an action close that requires your client to perform an action (send me an email, fax, etc.).

While there are a multitude of closes, below are three examples that are frequently used in staffing.

1. Alternate proposal. Ask your prospect to choose between two options or a set of circumstances that you provide. Their selection of one of the two is the close, so as soon as they make a choice, stop selling and get to work. For example, “Would you like that fee agreement emailed or faxed?” or “Would tomorrow morning be a good time to take the search assignment or would this afternoon be better?”

2. Weighing close. Some people refer to this as the “Ben Franklin Close.” It asks your client to mentally weigh the choice between using your services or not. This is best used when a client just needs a little nudge to close. Per the previous example, your client was looking for quantity and quality, speed and flexibility. At this point, the scale is tipped in their direction. You must now tip it in your direction. For example, “Our specialized teams can give you quantity and quality. Being the largest single-site search firm gives us the ability to respond quickly. Our 25-year experience gives us the maturity to be flexible.” At this point, the weighing close is equal. You’ve addressed each of their needs. Mentally, they are weighing their options and simply need a little push. “Did I also mention that we are a certified national testing center and we can test your engineers? Did I mention that we can do the background checks on your candidates in-house, which will speed up the process even further? Did I also mention that we have a national relocation service to assist your candidates with their relocation?” The reasons for working with you will far outweigh their reasons for not. Lastly, “Now, in your opinion, do you feel that you are better served working with us rather than not?”

3. Impending doom. All other closes have failed. They are seized by decision paralysis. This particular close is used frequently in the retail world and looks like “TONIGHT FROM 10-12 ONLY, THIS ONE-TIME SPECIAL EVENT FOR YOU AND ONLY YOU!!!” With regard to the client, there is an issue that needs to be met, they need to make a decision on a proposal, they need to pay a 30-day delinquent invoice, or we just need them to take action. For example, “I sent you the fee agreement two weeks ago today. You promised to have it to me five days ago. If I do not have it today by 5 p.m., we will be withdrawing ourselves from this search.” or “If you want us to start this search next month, then we must have your fee agreement and engagement fee before we commence the search.” This particular close is designed to say, “If you don’t do what I need you to do by a specific requirement, all bets are off.” You should never move forward with this client or attempt contact until whatever condition you set forth is met.

Sales is both an art and a science, and while there is a common thread of identifying the supporting needs as well as a time and a method to close, the nuances of these processes vary only slightly from methodology to methodology. Read as many sales books as you can. The one who is fully aware of the current dynamics of the conversation and has the skills and understanding to facilitate or direct that conversation is the person who will have the greatest influence over the outcome of the conversation.

Jeff Kaye is president and CEO of Kaye/Bassman International and Next Level Recruiting Training. This former Management Recruiter National Recruiter of the year has helped build the largest single-site search firm in the country, with annual search revenue in excess of $18 million. His firm has won national awards for philanthropy and workplace flexibility and also was named the best company to work for in the state of Texas in 2006 and 2007. Kaye/Bassman has retained over 30 search professionals whose annual production exceeds $400,000. The same training that helped build this successful firm is now available through Next Level Recruiting Training. They are making a series of DVDs for training. The first series was on the candidate side, and the four hours were dedicated to marketing. The new series, on the client side, is dedicated to marketing, effective search assignments, and fee clearing. It is over seven hours in length. To learn how to take your practice and business to the NEXT LEVEL, please visit www.nlrtraining.com to view their product and service offerings. You can also email Jeff a thought or question at jtk@nlrtraining.com.

TFL archives

Being a Recruiting Tour de Force



fordyce-default

I am a runner, I bike, I swim, and I compete in triathlons – not to win, just for fun and adventure. I really thought I was doing all this training to look and feel great in my fabulous forties. I did not realize that it would actually position me to become better at my job, rebuild the stamina that got me here in the first place, and enhance my ability to climb those recruiting hills and glide down the other side, and it has.

Before the Fordyce Forum conference, I knew I was changing my approach in my business. I was set to launch my new consulting firm this October and slowly hand over my recruiting business to another. At the conference I was re-awakened to my love for the actual art of recruiting, making the right match and creating the placement. I was enlightened to some things I was doing that were burning me out on the day-to-day hunt. When I came back I made a declaration to become a Recruiting Tour de Force and committed myself to making the necessary changes I needed to have that happen.

After analyzing my business, it was clear to me that we had a pretty large base in one general industry, which I have now labeled Drug & Medical Information. With only a few changes of ink I rebranded my company as specializing in that field, and I flew out to the DIA conference only three days after I returned from the Fordyce Forum. My son went online and built a plan for me so that I could use my four hours of time as wisely as possible when I arrived in Atlanta. I quickly walked the floor of the exhibit hall and met the players I set out to meet, made my contacts as an EXPERT in Drug & Medical Information, and flew back home the same night. I came back and called every referral I had and within two months signed up five new key clients in medical education, drug launch, and drug development.

My message to these companies and candidates is clear and simple. I am the person to know in the Chicago market, I am different because I benchmark each role, I meet the key players, I assess not only the candidate but also each opportunity and the company, and I present only the best of the best, oh and I almost forgot – the caveat is that I source names of people who are already working at your competitor or a targeted company or in a targeted industry of your choice. AND it is working! My largest customer even delivers me a fresh list of source names to call each month.

Yes, all these changes are positive and things are working out, but I won’t mislead you. My team and I are still working hard to build the new brand and the database. One of the things that keeps us going is when a staff member does something they never tried before and the fear that previously consumed them is released into a LOUD, JOYFUL HURRAH – that growth process feeds everyone else and gives us the power to keep pushing forward.

I am going to share my learning lessons from the last six months. My experience of what’s hot, what’s not, what’s worked, and what hasn’t as well as training tidbits from some of my seminars.

What’s HOT?

1. War on talent impacting every company on the planet
2. RPO – recruitment process outsourcing
3. Emerging industries – RPO, sourcing, selection, and retention
4. Major link between vacant chairs and loss of revenue
5. Niche recruiting disciplines
6. Industry experts
7. Recruiting being divided into sourcing and selection – some companies boast they can do it all; others segment into best services offerings in each category
8. Retention focus
9. Sourcing focus
10. Pipeline concern
11. Managers being held accountable for talent sourcing
12. Management being held accountable for retention
13. Management being held accountable for employee development

What’s NOT?

1. Generalist recruiting
2. Only using the job boards
3. Unemployed candidates
4. Running advertisements
5. Internet focus rather than people communications focus
6. One person being a hybrid expert at everything
7. Lone rangers
8. 35% fees for sourcing names only
9. Inflexibility of candidate interviews – location and time
10. Candidate evaluation based solely on gut instinct

What’s HOT with SOURCING?

1. RPO – complete sourcing and selection teams
2. Sourcing training
3. Direct recruiting
4. Ethical headhunting
5. Social media networking
6. Page ranking through blogging
7. Niche disciplines – everyone wants to know the expert
8. Virtual recruiting – work/life balance – stay-at-home moms raking it in
9. Corporate and agency contract recruiters making $25 to $105 per hour
10. Split boards and networks
11. Internal corporate and agency “sourcing” teams
12. Offshore sourcing
13. Active network association memberships
14. Agency high-performance teams – sourcers, evaluators, relationship managers
15. Sourcing systems, processes, and planning

What’s HOT with SELECTION?

1. Pre-employment screening
2. Pre-employment testing
3. Background checking
4. Credit checking
5. Social Security traces
6. DMV traces
7. Google searching
8. Lie detector testing (retail)
9. Benchmarking winners
10. Personality assessments
11. Behavioral-based interviewing
12. Values-based assessments
13. Competency testing
14. Skills testing
15. Pre-interview Online testing
16. Committee interviewing
17. Team-based assessments
18. Communication style assessments
19. Hiring systems
20. Clear expectations at time of interview
21. Pre-employment onboarding
22. Score and rank systems comparing candidates

Do’s and Don’ts of being a RECRUITING TOUR DE FORCE

DO

1. Get your clients’ commitment to you conducting the search.
2. Find out who your competition is, inside the company and out.
3. Find out what else they have done to find this person or these people.
4. Set the stage for you to control the hiring process.
5. Require that they put some skin in the game ($, time, resources).
6. Create a benchmark of values, behaviors, competencies by assessing the current key players on the team.
7. Gain more buy in that you are the recruiting force to be reckoned with.
8. Get a list of industry movers and shakers from the executives.
9. Get a list of companies to source from the executive directors.
10. Make it clear that all their competitors are calling the same list.
11. Clearly define the state of the talent pool and the challenge ahead of you.
12. Create a plan of action that utilizes 10 to 15 different resources for the search.
13. Set a goal to generate 10 new names per day, and reach out and touch 5 to 7 per day.
14. Limit your time on the boards.
15. Source good résumés.
16. Set the pace to harvest five names from each résumé.
17. Give the client a list that states when they can expect to get either results from you or reports on results from you.
18. Make a list of the social networks or resources you will use:
- LinkedIn
- Ning
- MySpace
19. Make a list of the traditional or recently traditional resources and boards you’ll use:
- Monster
- CareerBuilder
- Dice
- TheLadders
- Other niche boards
20. Run searches to see who comes up.
21. Contact these people and find out who they know.
22. Ask for introductions.
23. Ask for referrals.
24. Be an expert when you make those calls.
25. Use every call to brand yourself and your company and your discipline.
26. Ask who they know like themselves who is excellent at what they do and might be interested or who can route you in the right direction: remember, birds of a feather flock together.
27. Use some sort of system to qualify candidates so you can spend your time with the right people and generating more contacts.
28. Qualify your top candidates and compare them to the benchmark you established.
29. Continue to give your clients a view into the challenge of your search.
30. Be in communication about things like good candidates you are taking out of the running, new and similar search assignments, or pending candidates that you might be presenting. Let them know you are working for them. Stay in the loop on their progress as well.

DON’T

1. Jump into a search before you know what you are truly looking for.
2. Allow yourself to be treated like a vendor.
3. Take a brief specification or download the job description from the company website.
4. Overlook the importance of meeting or speaking with the key players – assess them through your own instinct or use appropriate tools.
5. Underestimate the power of an RPO or large vendor presence.
6. Get trapped into the find-the-right-résumé game.
7. Recruit only off the boards.
8. Get lazy or complacent.
9. Undervalue the time you’ll need to spend on shaking the referral tree and building your network.
10. Avoid planning.
11. Ignore your promises of what you said you’d produce.
12. Reject documentation or tracking of your results.
13. Work for free.
14. Spend too much time in one resource.
15. Let the candidate or the client run the show.

As I am taking my recruiting operation and merging it with my consulting firm, I am excited about the opportunities to compete in new markets, take on major projects, and play the recruiting game at a higher level. How exciting change and reinvention is!

I look forward to sharing more of my thoughts, lessons, and learning on the Tour de Force of Recruiting in my upcoming articles.

Margaret Graziano, CPC, CTS, and mother of three, has been a top producer in the staffing and recruiting industry for the past 20 years and has owned her own firm since 1991. She prides herself on client retention and making the right hires. She has earned over $5 million in personal “desk production” income and has placed over 2,000 candidates in direct-hire positions. With the competitive business world and the war on talent in full force, Margaret’s company, Alliance HR Network, has ventured into new realms of talent acquisition, organizational development, and human capital consulting services, thus diversifying Alliance’s revenue streams and gaining new and exciting talent acquisition and assessment consulting opportunities. Margaret’s email is mgraziano@alliancehrnetwork.com and her phone number is (847) 690-0077. The strategic planning forms are listed under a Strategic Planning Downloads section at http://www.alliancehrnetwork.com/employers/industry_training.asp.

TFL archives

Ask Barb



fordyce-default

Q. Do you have any ideas how to retain top producers? I can’t keep increasing their commission because then I don’t make any profit. I’ve promoted my big billers into management, and it’s really not working out well. They are great producers but not very good at training or mentoring other recruiters. I’ve lost three top producers in the last two years and really need to know how others are keeping their top people. Stephan G., Los Angeles

A. It’s important to know what motivates your various big billers. I know owners who have offered more flexibility, the ability to work virtual one or two days a week, or even a private office as added perks.

I faced this exact scenario several years ago and decided to build a team around my big billers, enabling them to become even greater superstars. Once they reach $350,000, I assign a candidate specialist who only recruits on the orders of this big biller. As a result, the big biller reaches an even higher level of production. Once this team of two is producing $500,000 in sales, I add an additional candidate specialist who again only works the candidate side of the placement process for this big biller. When this team of three reaches $750,000, I assign a researcher who helps mine names for the candidate specialists and does any research needed by the big biller.

The production of these teams continues to increase as the candidate specialists fine-tune their recruiting and matching skills. There are several benefits to this type of arrangement:

- You retain your big billers. It would be difficult for them to re-create their team.
- This enables more than one person to know and understand the needs of top clients.
- The candidate specialists do very well and learn how to become successful and earn a great income by working closely with these big billers.
- The big billers do not have supervisory responsibilities. The candidate specialists answer to their manager, who obtains feedback from the big billers.

If you’re wondering about compensation, the candidate specialist is handled the same way you would handle splits in your office. I probably should knock on wood before I make this statement, but I haven’t lost a big biller since I developed these “fearless foursomes.”

As an owner, you always need to ensure that all business is profitable. That is why you are in business. Remember, each big biller is different, and it is important that you identify exactly what individually motivates the individual. You can’t motivate these people; they will do things for their reasons, not yours! They quickly realize the many benefits of the “fearless foursome” arrangement, which enables them to focus on the 20% of what they do that gives them 80% of their results. They delegate the other tasks to their team members!

Q. I’m beginning to realize that one of my greatest problems is I don’t remember the candidates I meet. I have copies of their résumés and my notes attached to each application. I am, however, forgetting huge chunks of who they are. Do you have any thoughts? Suggestions? I need help. Thanks.
George M., Kansas City, MO

A. First of all, I have all my candidates complete my paperwork BEFORE my interview with them. This includes my profile form and inventory sheet. It allows me to gain a true picture of not only who they were and are (which is on their résumé) but just as important, who they “want to be”!

When you obtain more DETAILS, it helps you remember them. During your interview, you are writing down their definitions of words used on the form, e.g., growth, challenge, advancement, etc. This would make it impossible for you to forget “huge chunks” of who they are because you have everything in writing.

I also try to write down something that it is legal to note that will remind me of them. For example: Daughter plays soccer, big mustache, amazing smile, great dresser, or something unusual that they shared that will jog your memory.

To prevent the acceptance of counteroffers, I always draw a box on my profile form and ask what I have to say to them WHEN they get a counteroffer to bring them back to this moment in time. They will go on and on about why they would NOT accept a counteroffer. This information is very different from candidate to candidate, so it will help you remember them!

Here are some of the questions on my profile form that help me remember who candidates are (to request a FREE copy of my profile form, send an email to www.supportatstaffingandrecruiting.com):

- Five accomplishments and how they impacted your employer
- Five things you’d change about your current company if you were your boss
- Why you have made changes in the past and what MUST be there for you to make a change NOW
- Strengths
- Areas in which you would like to receive training
- Why someone should hire you over someone else with similar credentials
- Five adjectives that best describe you

The inventory sheet lists the various skills needed in your area of specialization and should indicate the number of years of experience in each area. This truly helps you with matching. In this fast-paced candidate-driven marketplace, it is critical that you remember your candidates, especially your MPCs (most placeable candidates)! You might also want to create a separate folder on your computer and in your desk where you keep the profile forms of the MPCs you interview – so they are always at your fingertips.

Lastly, there are various memory courses you can take that will enhance your ability to remember.

Q. How long should you keep a new hire? When should a recruiter make their first placement? I hate to let someone go right before they might help me get the money back that I’ve invested in them.
Stanley N., Youngstown, OH

A. I don’t think you should focus on HOW LONG you should keep a recruiter. You need to review your budget and know how MUCH you are willing to invest in a new hire. My number is $8,000! That includes salary, benefits, and bonuses. By the time I’ve spent that amount on a new hire, I expect to see results.

There is no set “time frame” for a first placement, but we do all we can to ensure that our new hire enjoys a placement in their first month. Time frame for a first placement depends on several issues:

1.Your area of specialization. (If you’re placing physicians, the process is very long!)
2. Whether you have a new hire start on the recruiting side of the placement process or work both sides.

a. My new hires work the candidate side of the process, working on the hot orders of established accounts – which gives them the best chance of quick success!

b. They must have three months of attaining their production goals on the candidate side of the business before they work the client side.

c. We find many candidate specialists who remain on the candidate side of the placement process.

3. Whether you have an ESTABLISHED client base or have your new hire start an entirely NEW area – which will take much longer to get up and productive.

4. Your training program had a great impact on new hires. I have the advantage of putting my new hires on my Top Producer Tutor, which jump-starts new hires to quick production.

You can wait forever for that deal that is pending to close and lose lots of money in the process. Set a budget for new hires and stick to it. Remember, you are in business for one reason – to make a PROFIT!

Barb Bruno, CPC, CTS, is one of the leading international speakers for the recruiting profession today. Sign up for Barb’s FREE NO BS Newsletter and receive notices on the two FREE teleconferences she conducts each month – one for owners, one for recruiters. Go to www.staffingandrecruiting.com/newsletter. If you would like to purchase a copy of the 24 proprietary forms Barb uses in her own search firm, go to www.staffingandrecruiting.com/forms. NOVEMBER BONUSES: Complete a FREE DEMO of Barb’s Top Producer Tutor and receive a copy of her book “Mastering the Balancing Act of the Working Manager” FREE – a $99 value! Call (219)663-9609 today and ask for Beth to set up the demo.

TFL archives

Zeroing In on Your Most Probable Client



fordyce-default

All successful firms have one thing in common – a single-minded dedication to their clients. That means knowing who their clients are, where they are, what their needs and perceptions are, how to communicate with them, and how to attract them. Those things are what a good marketing strategy is all about.

There is a process that leads to successful marketing. It begins with information about your markets and your clients. What you’re really after is insight and understanding about the way your clients and your prospects think, the way they act, and the way they make decisions.

Two essential pillars of a marketing program:

1. Psychographics:

Psychographics seeks to answer the question “How does my client think?” How much can you know about your client if you don’t know how they think? Here are some questions for determining your client’s psychographics:

- How does my client think?
- How do they make buying decisions?
- What is their view of recruiters?
- What are my client’s fears?
- What are my client’s misconceptions?
- What does my client think of me?

2. Demographics:

Demographics is a bit more straightforward than psychographics. It attempts to answer the question “Who is my client?” Here are some questions for determining your ideal client’s demographics:

- Where is my client located?
- What is my client’s income?
- What is my client’s education?
- What is my client’s social status?
- What is my typical client’s age?
- What is my client’s marital status?

Take a look at the last two years’ worth of placements to determine your most probable client profile and then fill in the data below:

My Ideal Company:

Number of employees:
Revenue:
Geographic scope:
Industry:
Culture:

My Ideal Hiring Authority:

Age:
Title:
Education:
Income:
Marital/family status:
Values:

Once you’ve determined your most probable client, answer these questions as well:

1. Who will you not work with (HR only/bad ethics/under 20%, etc.)?

2. What is your ideal fee schedule?

3. What fee terms will you not accept? What are you willing to negotiate?

4. What is the total number of prospects in your potential client universe?

5. How many of those companies do you currently work with?

6. Who are your top five target companies for the next 12 months?

Gary Stauble is the principal consultant for The Recruiting Lab, a coaching company that assists firm owners and solo recruiters in generating more profit in less time. Gary offers several FREE SPECIAL REPORTS, including “14 Critical Candidate Questions” and “The Search Process Checklist,” on his website. Get your copy now at www.therecruitinglab.com.